What is it about these men who have to categorise every woman into a box of “would fuck” “would not fuck”

They wouldn't call it out because to them being fuckable is probably the highest compliment. These women don't seem to define themselves by anything else.

To be fair Jezebel has a regular feature called “would you” that does this for men

What is it about these men who have to categorise every woman into a box of “would fuck” “would not fuck” (see his feud with Taylor swift as well). It says so much about his opinion of women that that’s what his sisters-in-law are reduced down to and says so much about them that they’re not calling out this bullshit.

I agree. I purposely do not click on anything Kartrashian, I just scrolled too far down after the article about Albert Pachinkos’s bathing habits. It was actually more interesting than any fake thing that Kim and her family does.

I’m sitting here eating a little breakfast and I honestly could just vomit all over this table. I am really starting to detest these people. Kanye is disgusting. They’re all abhorrent. From here on out, I will not be clicking through to anymore posts about these people. 

With Matthew Newton, i don’t know so much if it’s “alleged assault” if he attacked Rachael Taylor in the lobby of a hotel in Italy. It was all over the news in Australia and he always managed to get off very easy because of his “celebrity” and famous dad.

I was thinking the same when the news was first announced. I am disappointed that the domestic (Australian) media apparently didn’t do enough to cancel him permanently after what he did to poor Rachael Taylor.

Yeah, kept waiting for the part where he rewarded her for her good intentions or at least made a contribution to a food bank or something in her honor.

There is no way Laura Wasser would be stupid enough to allow someone to leak that she is unhappy with a client’s behavior and thinking of quitting.  That’s a major, major ethical violation if true, and Jolie could sue the everloving shit out of her for it.

Seriously if I ran into Scott Disick or even his doppleganger and I were inclined to ask “do I know you?” he or his likeness could reply with anything from “yes, we shared a class together” to “maybe, I’m one of the Chainsmokers” and I would totally believe anything I’m told. He is the standing definition of…

So, Keith bought this lady a nice seafood dinner after she bought his hobo-lookin’ ass some snacks at the mini mart, right? RIGHT? He did not just let Miss Ruth Reed pay for his snacks and leave.

I would do Paul. I wouldn’t even shit on Scott. 

She’s definitely a nightmare. But she isn’t claiming he didn’t give her a dime. But that he isn’t providing meaningful support consistent with their informal agreement. And is asking for a formal child support order now.

How the hell did Bert Newton’s delinquent child get anywhere near Jessica Chastain’s orbit??

You can’t spell “Disick” without “dick.”

This dirt bag is so boring it got filed to Jerry O’Connell

A good friend of mine worked as a graphic designer for that turd in NYC. He said he was just a big of an entitled, pompous asshole in real life.

Blue eyes and a beard do not a Doppelgänger make. I don’t see how they could be mistaken for each other, unless “all blue-eyed men look the same.”

You could show up places and be paid to leave, or threaten to move next door and be paid not to. You could have a dunking booth, how comfortable are you being dunked? I feel like these are also jobs the Scott look a like could have but for the segment of the population that would want to meet and party with Scott.