What the WHAT? Someone with even a toddler’s grasp of anatomy should understand that this is the worst idea in the history of ideas.

Also, who else here is tied of pooping? Have I got a solution for you! It’s called “Krazy-Glue Your Asshole Shut” and it’s the time-saver we’ve all been waiting for!

“Reason being women are focused on and distracted by your period 25% of the time, making them far less productive than they could be”

My dickhole clenched reading that. If something needs to escape down there, you should let it out.

So like, urine will “unstick” the labia, but not equally-as-wet menstrual blood?

Oh, right, that too. I forgot about the poor sperm donor forced to pay for life for a mistake he made. It doesn’t occur to them that the woman will also be paying for life because the woman is just the...what was that term? Oh, yeah, she’s just the host while she’s pregnant, and they haven’t considered what will…

Well, she could ask for child support, and then people would say she wants to live at the expense of the poor man who was tempted into the fruits of sex by her and now wants to punish him for her mistake.

Do they realize their brand name looks like it would be pronounced “men says”? I ain’t taking no period advice from men (unless they’re doctors) and I am certainly not gluing anything shut. What the fucking hell?

And if she wants, oh, I don’t know, health care for herself and her kid, food, housing, and a bit of help so she can raise the kid they forced her to have, well, they’re just moochers living off the government dole, even if she does have a job that doesn’t really pay a living wage.

So, nowadays a fetus can have anesthesia and ultrasounds and the woman is forced to be at the doctor if she wants an abortion.

Or just give the patient an aspirin and be like “hey, its a painkiller! Requirement met.”

But a parent’s right to rear their child as they see fit would just be another constitutional challenge. The problem with these laws isn’t the legality of them (as almost all of them, this one included) are obviously unconstitutional. The problem is the damage that is done in the meantime.

This is the problem I see with the whole framework of science vs. faith over the last few years. When the conversation is framed such that the two are positioned as equally opposite and valid options, people convince themselves that their feelings, beliefs and faith are equal to the scientific method and there’s no…

You know, why not get one of the “parents” of the “child” to waive the anesthesia?

Well, they are written by trolls who happened to be elected into office, so I suppose we oughtn’t be surprised.

Who hasn’t found themselves thinking lately that laws need to be worded less straight-forwardly, and more like riddles posed by a troll before you can cross their bridge?

legislators argued that a fetus can feel pain

It’s almost like politicians shouldn’t be writing legislation about medical practices they know nothing about. I mean, I don’t show up at circuses and tell lion tamers how to do their jobs, anymore than I want them stopping by my classroom with tips on pedagogy.

If you press gently but firmly for 8.5 seconds just above the navel, the resulting pressure prevents the fetus from feeling any pain for the next five hours. This was proven in the same study they used to prove fetal pain.

“I guess I’m breaking the law, but I don’t know how to not break it because no one would tell me,” Torres said.