Kimmel would pitch in yes, a system like this would be tax funded and I presume he pays quite a lot of tax. Obamacare may not be a well-designed system but this could well be as it was trying to be a half-way system. It’s unlikely socialised healthcare is a huge disaster if most OECD countries use it to at least some…

I know this won’t happen with a repub government or most likely with a democrat one but if the Government gets completely involve, IE Universal Healthcare than it quite probably won’t get worse.

Yes but you need to consider many people can’t work for someone else immediately just to get better insurance. Also as others have said as health care is an essential part of life it’ll have huge profit margins if it can.  

The problem seems to be half-way solutions rarely work. I personally think the US should adopt a universal system but realise the problems that may occur from having a country that currently has a very large medical industry switching to a mainly government based system.

The US public school system is socialist, that’s where most Americans would’ve had their simple English lessons.

That seems like a decent system, if not something of that elk wouldn’t be offered in basically every other OECD.

As others have said, I’d say Jimmy being able to afford it actually makes him a better example. He, probably, gains from a Repub Congress and less government intervention but still believes it’s wrong. Admittedly you could be cynical and say he’s just doing it for his son or because his network forced him too but that…

It was cross-posted from Vitals. It’s Kinja being Kinja and not making it obvious the article was a cross-post.

It’s a repost from Vitals. They blog about health of course they’ll mention any laws/stories about health care.

To be honest promising socialised Health Care shouldn’t be equivalent to promising the Moon. I know that it wouldn’t get passed in the US but it works relatively well in several other industrialised countries.

To be fair this is a vitals.lifehacker piece that’s been cross posted over, and I’d say Healthcare/Insurance news is worth blogging about on a Health blog.

To be honest this seems like a perfectly valid reason to protest.

Overall good article, one point though it seems like people will realise what’d happen without Environmental restrictions by showing them one of their local(ish) cities that was covered in Smog before laws were passed to stop it. LA and Manhattan seem to be two good examples of that.

I think the difference is that Super Mario 64 did add something whereas all a 3D screen does is make the game more immersive. It also did lead to loads of bad early games for the 3DS just being X 3D rather than trying even a little with their own gimmick.

First off I’m not trying to say you’re wrong in believing in lower taxes just wondering why you think the Government shouldn’t control your money.

Firstly this would’ve required implementing into law decades ago so isn’t actually feasible stateside but;

I think another commenter said they’re offering a 1440p panel around june time but in the mean time I do agree having a higher res panel would be nice as an option as long as they offered the 1080p panel with everything else top of the range.

AFAIK it depends on the edit suite. The majority of Prosumer and consumer ones are not able to use the GPU for rendering. Most properly professional suites probably expect you to send the rendering off to a specialised server/farm

Is it though, In general to get use out of a screen with more than 1080P you’d need either a specialised use case or a 19 inch screen.

I’m well aware they’ve done that with their consumer lines but did they ever do it with their business ones?