I mean.....you’re not wrong. I saw someone on Twitter suggest having Judge Judy as a moderator, and that seems about like what this situation calls for. It’s not about who’s right, it’s about who can yell the loudest! ‘MERICA! /s
Linxly
linxly
I just don’t get why anyone would call this a ‘debate’. It wasn’t. A debate means that each person (or team) makes an opening statement - then you go back and forth with rebuttal in a timed format. This is what should have happened here. The moderator should ask the question then give stump two minutes - warn him at…
People identify as radical progressives and socialist and then act SHOCKED that the one elected official in the entire country of 350 million people who has to appeal to every single American to win doesn’t “excite them.”
When it’s not your turn to speak, your microphone is turned off. Why don’t they do this? It would improve the quality of political debates in this country immensely.
True and changes nothing I said.
They are not undecided. They just don’t want to admit to who they are voting for.
Amen. I’m not normally one for disenfranchising people but if you’re an undecided voter now, you’re obviously unable to handle the rigors of decisionmaking and just need to be slapped.
At debates, mics need to only be on if it’s that candidates time to talk. I don’t get why this hasn’t been done (besides obviously wanting to make it seem more like a spectacle).
There was a lively debate on my community Facebook page when someone asked for an “objective” news source. Several folks (myself included) suggested the PBS NewsHour, C-SPAN, NPR, as well as wire services like AP and Reuters.
“Powerful”? I just saw an insecure bully who’s too much of a pussy to abide by the rules. Truly powerful people don’t need to cheat at debating (or golf, or in their business dealings, or on their taxes, or...). They can win on their own merits.
I have heard MANY people say “I only watch Fox News because everything else is fake.” And some of those people have turned on that network because Chris Wallace tried to get Trump to actually answer a question.
Look, I’m not amped up about Biden being the candidate. But I ain’t gonna drag his performance last night. We all knew what was coming. Trump is a deranged lunatic. Whoever was gonna face him was going to get this treatment. I don’t think a lot of people could handle a maniac bellowing incessantly while you’re trying…
Hell, the way Trump just shrugged off Biden bringing up Beau to continue to attack Hunter was... I don’t even know how to describe it. It was clearly a strategy as they probably wanted to draw Biden in to attacking Trump’s children, but it was also clear that Biden campaign had prepared for that. Still, I don’t know…
This.
Like they will acknowledge the media ever giving them equal treatment. The media is always going to be the enemy. All that shit does is give them quotes to push their agenda.
How else can they prove to MAGA hats that they’re not part of the radical leftist agenda unless they both-sides everything?
Your take is decidedly different, and much more correct, than Osberg’s post just a few minutes ago.
And if she turns out to be horrible well... it’s only for life.
This pick infuriates the blue state “libtards,” and that’s really all he or his base need to know. Their ideology does not extend beyond maintaining power and keeping their boot on our necks.