Funnily enough, Reynolds was in Blade Trinity. And I don't know about you, but The Woman in Gold looks fantastic, and The Captive sounds great too. You know, for a Canadian film...

I feel there's a trend... that all the bad characters are from terrible films...

You and I remember the '99 VMAs differently. Only regarding the twerking, though. Because TLC's "No Scrubs" was pretty twerky. And so was Britney Spears' co-performance with *nsync. And of all things, Lil' Kim's flashing show is probably worse (or better, depending how you look at it) than Miley Cyrus' twerk.

It was "Jane, stop this thing. I order you, stop!"

The first two minutes of that film resonate very well, and they're also the funniest. Literally the only thing that kept me watching. Oh, and knowing how stellar a cast it had (hint: the good cast made a bad movie).

Agreed, except for the fact that Ryan Reynolds is far more in the midst of his fame than Wesley Snipes was, he was very much at the end of his popular career.

Update: The Blade films were all R rated and all made over $100M each. Not the kind of numbers we get now from comic films, but if made right, Deadpool could achieve between Blade and X-Men kind of numbers, I would say.

Right now, this would cost less (or the same) and probably be more successful than most non-super hero R rated action flicks. Hell, wasn't Blade R rated? That still managed to get 2 sequels.

That's exactly what I think this is. Similar to #DIRTYLAUNDRY being Thomas Jane's way of saying "Hey, I can be Punisher AND the film doesn't have to be shit".

Chris Hemsworth in Blackhat is kind of like Hugh Jackman in Swordfish. And I imagine if Heath Ledger had lived on, he'd have made a bad movie about hacking too. Seems it's a typecast for Australians to do after making a comic film blockbuster.

Make that shit happen. Hell, throw in Batman, Superman, Hellboy, Billy Madison and Rainman while you're at it. Oooooh back to schooool.

Only #1 was new to me, and the extent to which the US's state of mortality for birth mothers and first day mortality of babies; I knew they were bad, but this is woeful. You guys need to get your shit together in terms of your healthcare system.

I disagree, it means that the study's value is worthy of being considered. It's importance is not measured by the study itself, but against the merits for which the study exists. This one is an attempt to skew accepted nomenclature because people don't choose to try to understand a wholly accepted term.

I think of energy in only two forms: charge and calories. If it can't get my body or my car and appliances going, it's not energy.

Blame Einstein for that one coming into the zeitgeist, but blame hyperbolic scriptwriters' creative imaginations for making it such a common misconception. After all, were we to stop using 90% of our brain, and even reducing nine tenths of any part of our brain, our basic ability to operate would be severely…

If I had (or more accurately, needed to enlist) a stepfather, I think yours would make the shortlist.

To be fair, for those who've not chosen to research it, let alone make archaeology, paleontology or geology part of their primary field of study, it's hard to remember the typical scientific determinations of the periods which our world has gone through, nor what took place in those eras... But I'm pretty sure most…

"Proof" does exist. Only not in science, it's a purely mathematical term, because mathematics, in the fort of a proof, is indisputable. "Evidence" and "research" and "conclusions" are all viable results that science can demonstrate.

See, I found myself doing more wading in the late 80s than I do these days, and that included Adam Sandler, Mike Myers, Dana Carvey and others. They've really seen a massive revival in the last 5 years, I kid you not. It's still never wall to wall funny (although the Chirstmas episode was about as close to it as it…

You might be snarky, but you'll never be Peter Capaldi in the thick of it or in the loop snarky.