I think you miss the point of this feature.

Also:
• ignorant restaurant customer unfamiliar with the legitimate and established cuisine known as tex-mex
• picky customer who won't eat anything outside of their comfort zone
• customer overly-critical of the quality and authenticity of fast-food

That's amazing. I think I would have gotten stuck on "what's an herb"? I mean, obviously I know, but how do you actually explain something so basic. It's like when my toddler asks "what is the sky" I'm like "I don't even know where to start... it's... above us?"

Nothing worse than linguinies that are picked too soon. Grilling them more won't even make them tender.

A brief memo to my fellow humans:

I admit, the ONLY book from the New 52 that I felt was "improved" with the reboot was Aquaman (and that's only because Geoff Johns was a good writer).

"Think about where this could lead if government gets involved in science and medicine."

it should be illegal to do what most of the papparazzi does. it's straight up stalking and invasion of privacy, etc. i am not going to act like i am not a consumer but jesus h christ.

Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

CAN YOU TEACH US HOW TO DO THIS PLS?

THANK GOD! I've always thought he was underpowered.

Fox guy who thinks he is a psychiatrist.

Sullivan claimed, too that "Society did fine" before mental illness was widely understood

This is actually one of *the* dumbest things you can do. Basically you are again creating a power differential between the ones who live off campus and can access booze and those who live on campus. I went to both a dry and a wet campus and I felt approximately 1 million times safer at the wet campus because I was…

Raise your hand if you went to a college that prohibited liquor yet you still drank it any way. This will accomplish nothing except deflecting the issue.

Is it really re-victimizing someone? If you are abused, obviously you are a victim, but if it is proven you are unable to protect your children/continuing to put them in dangerous situations, you shouldn't have your kids anymore. Someone who can protect them should have them.

Omg I knew before even scrolling down into the comments there would be people defending latte lady. I KNEW IT.

Ya know, I sort of wish they'd stuck to their guns on the filing so the court would have no choice buy to rule in a well publicized case that trans people ARE protected. I mean, I know there's already precedent for that, but it'd be nice to see it very publicly reinforced.

Note how she didn't say "Islamism" or "the Jihad" or even "radical nut jobs who masquerade as religious crusaders when they are actually just rotten pieces of shit." No, she said "Islam." As in, any Muslim period is a threat to America.

Given the allegations in the lawsuit, the headline is exactly what the word "condone" means, hence the word "allegedly." If you're going to throw out definitions as some kind of argument, you should probably a) know what they mean, and b) know what the rest of the words in the headline mean, too.