I admit, the ONLY book from the New 52 that I felt was "improved" with the reboot was Aquaman (and that's only because Geoff Johns was a good writer).

"Think about where this could lead if government gets involved in science and medicine."

it should be illegal to do what most of the papparazzi does. it's straight up stalking and invasion of privacy, etc. i am not going to act like i am not a consumer but jesus h christ.

CAN YOU TEACH US HOW TO DO THIS PLS?

Fox guy who thinks he is a psychiatrist.

Sullivan claimed, too that "Society did fine" before mental illness was widely understood

This is actually one of *the* dumbest things you can do. Basically you are again creating a power differential between the ones who live off campus and can access booze and those who live on campus. I went to both a dry and a wet campus and I felt approximately 1 million times safer at the wet campus because I was…

Raise your hand if you went to a college that prohibited liquor yet you still drank it any way. This will accomplish nothing except deflecting the issue.

Is it really re-victimizing someone? If you are abused, obviously you are a victim, but if it is proven you are unable to protect your children/continuing to put them in dangerous situations, you shouldn't have your kids anymore. Someone who can protect them should have them.

Omg I knew before even scrolling down into the comments there would be people defending latte lady. I KNEW IT.

Ya know, I sort of wish they'd stuck to their guns on the filing so the court would have no choice buy to rule in a well publicized case that trans people ARE protected. I mean, I know there's already precedent for that, but it'd be nice to see it very publicly reinforced.

Note how she didn't say "Islamism" or "the Jihad" or even "radical nut jobs who masquerade as religious crusaders when they are actually just rotten pieces of shit." No, she said "Islam." As in, any Muslim period is a threat to America.

Given the allegations in the lawsuit, the headline is exactly what the word "condone" means, hence the word "allegedly." If you're going to throw out definitions as some kind of argument, you should probably a) know what they mean, and b) know what the rest of the words in the headline mean, too.

If a person does not consent to a sex act, it is rape.

You know what pisses me off? That for oblivious white dudes like Graham, rape is a "definitional" or "intellectual" issue because they can never ever comprehend the fact that for women, rape is a visceral embodied issue and almost every day of our lives, we have to compute a million different ways to protect…

Dear Republican Women:

For every asshole apologist in this thread trying to justify why bringing your own goddamned food to a goddamned restaurant is ok, I feel the need to share my own personal slice of why that is is literally the Worst Idea Ever.

I don't think that couple were Autistic.

Especially because if you're polite, restaurants bend over backwards to help with allergies. My dad is allergic to onions. We've never once had a problem, even though onions are in virtually everything.

I'm absolutely confused by the "eat their own food" people. Why would you think that bringing your own food to a place that serves food be cool? If you want to eat your own food somewhere nice, have a picnic in the park. I think its much worse having people eat their own food in a restaurant then not permitting them…