lilmisscanada
lilmisscanada
lilmisscanada

Eh.  We don’t have to cut down Kate to hold up Meghan.  There can be more than one woman at a time who isn’t trashed.

Honor dictates that you name names if you’re going to make an allegation as incendiary as the one about the conversation about the baby’s skin tone. You don’t just throw that allegation out there and say only that it was a family member. That puts the whole family under a cloud of suspicion and denies the accused

I’m all for anyone bringing down any royal family. That said- get a job, ya deadbeats.

I really hope that this doesn’t overshadow tonight’s episode of “Allen vs Farrow”. They have some 60 boxes of evidence, including the case worker for Dylan Farrow. He was fired when he refused to back down from the case, and his supervisor quit a year later because Woody Allen was never charged. 

There is no “Royal Blood”. You’ve got A, AB, B and O. Anything else is an affectation.

The main reason I don’t believe they were behind it is that they were several years too late. Why wait until they were divorced? Wouldn’t they have done it before everyone’s reputations were in tatters and their motive was obvious? If not for that logic, I would be inclined to believe they did it.

And this ridiculousness is why the monarchy isn't long for this world. Who gives a shit about flower girls wearing tights? 

The family didn’t ask them to jump right in. William and Kate, future king and queen, took a 3 years easing-in period while they were newlyweds and the Queen was supportive. Meghan and Harry were the ones who famously said they were going to hit the ground running.
As for the use of “royal” in their marketing, the

But they are comparing dissimiliar situations. Like their claims about the royals seeking outside employment...Pretty clear call-out of Beatrice and Eugenie, both of who have never been working royals. And, I believe one of them even got called out and stopped when she tried to use Royal as part of a branding thing.

That is a lot of half true information.

As long as Canadian taxpayers don’t have to foot a single loonie towards their security or whatever, I don’t care about their motivation.

I still say the most reasonable solution is to eat them all. 

Fuck the monarchy as a general rule, but damn it’s wild whenever a story involving Wallis Simpson doesn’t also note that she was, you know, a Nazi. Kinda one of those things that should follow your name around forever. 

The only letters Wallis Simpson probably wanted were ‘SS’, so that was probably a good call.

Women named Lori need to quit doing stupid/illegal* shit and trying to get away with it.

Right?! You bought a transatlantic flight for anywhere between $400-800 (so you have a credit card!) and then fly on to Amsterdam for cocktails, but you can’t charge a further €30 for a safe place to sleep??? You can also somehow afford to feed yourself for months in a country you're not allowed to work in. Ok...

No. It’s a freedom space in which to keep your freedom. Duh.

Who is this marketed towards? The people that like Tomi don’t wear leggings. The people that wear leggings don’t watch Fox News.

Replacing the word “dog” with “social media celebrity” in your post makes your statement equally valid.

When I’ve had a rough day and I come home and my 75 pound dog jumps on me, I take a step back, put my hands behind my back, look her in the eyes and say “No.” in a calm but firm manner.