As a Gen Xer from a super sexist household, these books appealed to me for all the wrong reasons. When my sister and I were “well-behaved” and did what our parents wanted, we didn’t really get any other attention. Our submissiveness was our value.

what they need is to make a giant mcdonalds chicken nugget, put it on a bun with szechuan sauce, and then do a mulan/rick and morty tie in. their nuggets are delicious and would be fantastic on a bun.

This is the only relevant answer.

As long as someone isn’t trying to pull into the spot on the other side it is totally fine.

Would you look at all that meat!

As countries and states continue to ban fur, Indigenous People are disproportionately feeling the effects and it’s devastating their livelihoods. While there are often provisions for Indigenous use or goods, the burden is on the seller to prove that the fur was harvested traditionally and that they are Indigenous and…

The things is, this isn’t clickbait. This is the beginning of the two progressives realizing There can be only one.

Or... and hear me out here... this kind of giving should be built into our tax system in an equitable way and properly apportioned to social services so that nobody has to suffer through living on the most impoverished budgets.

That won’t stop the unlicensed drivers in your scenario from 1) driving just as fast anyway, or 2) running into your smug ass and your high-speed license plate. Probably while not insured. 

For a not inconsiderable portion of the population marriage is as much an economic choice as an emotional one, though we're loath to admit it. Maintaining one household with two incomes (hopefully) is one of the few paths still open to build even a modest measure of wealth. Two houses for a married couple is for most…

Unless raising children in a conventional way is the goal, I see no point in marriage at all. I especially do not get it when very rich people marry each other. Back when I was married, living jointly was not really fully accepted. But marrying only to live apart baffles me to no end. What is the point? My ex and I…

can we just “cancel” Dr. Oz?  Yes, he is legitimately a medical professional (as you say, cardiothoracic surgeon) yet he does nothing but abuse his title promoting nonsense based on stuff that is way out of his area of expertise. 

Youll notice those numbers dropped 200k cars in 4 years. If they weren't worries, they weren't paying attention

Yeah but by the late 80s sales were falling fast. Basically GM killed Oldsmobile when they ended the Rwd platforms and made every division use the same GM corporate engines. It's what also killed Pontiac but much more slowly.  

It’s a common tactic around here. If you don’t have a good argument, ask someone for their sources so you can nitpick the publication rather than try to make a contrasting argument.

Hasn’t been replicated? The study was published in December 2019. Last month. How quickly do you think it can be replicated?

Scotty Kilmer is a complete hack and a cancer to YouTube.

I’m no right-winger, but I think this is a much more complex issue than has been perpetuated. Conservatives aren’t the only ones protesting this issue, though their (underlying, prejudicial) reasoning is certainly unique.

Yep.  I really wish Raph would stop covering the Ghosn stuff because it’s clear it’s not something he’s capable of covering objectively for whatever reason.  “I’m going to die in prison” and “I should have taken that other job that I turned down” are not only reasonable but logically correct positions for someone who…

Damnit. When did “Michiganian” become the preferred demonym?! I miss Michigander and Michigoose.