Same principle, draw your attention with the hope of a click.

Well I mean not really, at the end of the day they want to make something that draws your attention to their thumbnail in a sea of them on the screen. For new viewers of a channel, like I follow a bunch of creators and my YT feed is pretty curated at home and work. But like at work it’s 90% music, and when I finish a…

What do you know con trails, condensation trails, actually led to snow, it’s almost like there is water in that stuff after all.

Non-subscriber clicks are more important to the algorithm to get their videos pushed on the homepage. But getting more subscribers, which moves them up in the internal YT stack, which leads to more overall views, hopefully, also leads to more revenue for the channel. More eyeballs and more views/watch time all make…

I was kind of thinking the same thing. Like yes lets attack the thing covered in cameras broadcasting 24/7 that seems like a smart idea.

Exactly though sometimes once you get big enough, while you can’t just ignore the algorithm you can sometimes still do things you want, though most of the time a channel will then create a sub channel to do that.  LTT has something like half a dozen sub channels, and hell Simon Whistler aka Fact Boy seems like he has…

Yeah unless you got in on the YT thing early and have build a base, you have to play HARD into what the algorithm wants, regardless of what kind of content you want to make. I have had numerous creators I follow talk about it, and frankly most of them don’t really like it. But it’s something they MUST do to keep…

So using Google Translate, I assume Backpfeifengesicht refers to “YouTube Face”, and yes they have to do it. Matt Farrah has talked about it several times on his podcast. They hired a firm to analyze their channel and they proved that just doing “YouTube Face” i.e. the over exaggerated smiling face 100% generates more…

I said it on the OG article, but many of the things people are complaining about, cringey thumbnails, click baitey titles, are exactly what creators are forced to do and they hate it as much as we do. They have to do it for the YT algorithm, which seemingly gives more weight to views from non subscribers than it does…

If watching VinWiki videos has taught me anything it’s that you can find neat cars in crazy places that aren’t the normal auction sites.

True allows more ground clearance with stock wheels tires which is handy. And keeps the stock suspension geometry, which a some folks bro dozering out or sticking on the absolute biggest wheels/tires they can possibly fit don’t account for. 

I mean portal axels just give you more pumpkin clearance without having to do with taller tires. And in this case a gear down.

I don’t have the money but I want.

Hell I would trust a Rally driver doing something like this than ANY other race car driver save maybe a Formula Drift driver.

Yeah house flips go through “generational” looks or themes. When the Magnolia folks, whatever their names are, out of Waco started blowing up it was all ship lap siding and sliding barn doors lol.  

Yeah it’s a minor gripe as I very rarely even use my high beams I drive mostly in town and it’s well lit.

Fair enough, still hate it lol. It just makes almost all modern buildings so freaking boring.

100% agree, I wish new buildings could have more to their design than just big beige box with a sign, being kind of the only decoration. It seems like every town in the US instituted building codes that forbid any kind of choice/options for new buildings. The only ones we have that have a neat design are old buildings…

Realistically none, but this may be faster. But that’s a big maybe since these types of tracks have speed limitations.

Interesting, my last 3 cars, 2 Chrysler and a Ford had a push forward for high beams and it didn’t reset. I prefer the pull back for high beams, hell I wish they had footwell high beam buttons still lol.  I have auto lights on my car and literally NEVER touch them lol, the only time I had to was after getting a yearly…