When it comes to where an education dollar can be spent that is most likely get pull a person out of poverty, yes, there is a huge difference. Allowing somebody to get a two-year associates or vocational training that immediately translates into employment opens up options for them down the line to pursue their own…

1. I don’t blame you for putting in the only number you have. I’m just pointing out that it’s likely not an accurate number.

There was a shitty IUD in the 70’s that could spread an infection in your lady parts. Risks of the same with modern IUDS is essentially zero.

I’d just like to point out here that 1.) national age to gauge first sexual contact is largely self-reported, so who really knows? and 2.) There is a HUGE different between being put on benzos and birth control. For starters, trying to kick a benzo without stepping down can give you a seizure and kill you. Benzos are…

Uh . . . are you . . . uh married? Because that’s the kind of man I need to wind up with. *coughs*

That was the correct response, obvi.

OBERON FOR THE WIN! KALAMAZOO REPRESENT!

Have you considered an IUD? The mirena iud generally makes your periods lighter and sometimes stops them completely. I know some doctors are prescribing it off label to help with endo.

>colorado reduced its teen pregnancy rate by 40%

Mirena Iuds (hormonal, not the paraguard which is copper) are actually being used off-label by doctors as a treatment for endo right now, so I'd say yes to what you're saying there.

>gold-digger adjacent

Peeing in a bottle is usually because you are stopped at a stop without bathrooms (like a border crossing, waiting for an inspection to clear, or on a company's lot waiting to unload but they screwed up their scheduling and you can't back up to a dock and unload for several hours). You literally cannot move the truck…

Peeing in a bottle is usually because you are stopped at a stop without bathrooms (like a border crossing, waiting for an inspection to clear, or on a company's lot waiting to unload but they screwed up their scheduling and you can't back up to a dock and unload for several hours). You literally cannot move the truck…

Peeing in a bottle is usually because you are stopped at a stop without bathrooms (like a border crossing, waiting for an inspection to clear, or on a company's lot waiting to unload but they screwed up their scheduling and you can't back up to a dock and unload for several hours). You literally cannot move the truck…

Peeing in a bottle is usually because you are stopped at a stop without bathrooms (like a border crossing, waiting for an inspection to clear, or on a company's lot waiting to unload but they screwed up their scheduling and you can't back up to a dock and unload for several hours). You literally cannot move the truck…

Peeing in a bottle is usually because you are stopped at a stop without bathrooms (like a border crossing, waiting for an inspection to clear, or on a company's lot waiting to unload but they screwed up their scheduling and you can't back up to a dock and unload for several hours). You literally cannot move the truck…

Scientifically speaking, you can't "prove" GSA. We can only gather more evidence, and that evidence is going to be extremely flawed because we can't actually run a GSA experiment (which would be the only way to 'prove' cause and effect.) (I shudder to think what such an experiment would look like.)

Again, I think you are misinterpreting (the admittedly ambiguously worded statement) above. The desire to do or not do something is irrelevant to it becoming a taboo. The ability of the behavior to destabilize social structures is taboo.

No, the point goddess was making is that institution of a taboo is not related to whether or not people want to do it—that is a common assumption but is logically false. The institution of a taboo is based almost solely upon the behavior's ability to destabilize society.

This was largely my response, as well.