I havent read a single comment saying you are a bad mom. Maybe some of the greys are saying that, but I havent seen it.

Of course there is.

Or ask them to say who gets what. I have my clients give each kid a color of post it and they just go around the house post it-ing everything they want then mom and dad add those instructions in the will. I also recommend they tell the kids what is to be done with everything NOT tagged (sold? donated? who get the…

I dont think so either. It looks like they are TRYING to get a court to do that, but the opt out letter REQUIRES an Equifax ID. You dont get one when you just check if you were possibly a victim.

It doesnt limit the agreement to signing up. It says “use” so I would think they are trying to apply it to finding out if you are hacked.

This is the first paragraph:

But they can. The same way they can walk down the street and if they overhear someone talking about doing something illegal that can lead to an investigation, a search warrant and arrest. walking down the street is the same as flipping through Facebook feeds.

By that same logic if a restaurant refuses to serve black people they can just go to the one next door right? I’m sorry but this is not a logical viewpoint or even a viewpoint based in law.

No one is forcing them to produce anything. They can shut down whenever they want. They are bakers. They are a corporation. They are in a business to produce a good.

A wedding cake is a good. By definition. If you wanna make “art” close up shop and make them in your home. If you want to be a business with all the benefits of a business abide by the rules.

That is not even close to the same. Wife beaters are not a protected class. Neither is white supremacy.

You keep moving the goalposts. First it was ANY investigation, then it was an investigation that involves a search. Let me be clear:

An investigation is not a search or a seizure under the law. And I agreed that probable cause is needed for warrants. So again, what makes you think you need probable cause for an investigation?

Cite your source because you dont need probable cause to start an investigation. And starting an investigation is very different and separate from any sort of search or when you need a warrant. A lot of investigation work is done without a warrant.

Ok then your weird hypothetical is not even applicable. No one is saying “let IRS agents live with you” so it is irrelevant at best.

That is, generally, not true. You need probable cause for searches and to be arrested. Not to investigate.

Ah I see.

I assume there is no record of her entry or her being here at all.

Except it isnt. Neither the article or the law journal that it uses to cite provide a single statute or IRS code that public data cannot be used. AT BEST they suggest that people who post things on facebook might not KNOW that the IRS would find it so it could possibly violate the IRS rules about getting notice, even…

This is a poor analogy. Your home has a clear 4th amendment protection. It might even violate the 3rd if you can find a way to consider IRS agents soldiers (you might since they are part of the executive branch, subject to the president’s wishes and under his control). There is even a right for them to stand on the…