levidettwyler
Levi Dettwyler
levidettwyler

Play it and find out. It's the same game, but it's not. It's so not.

It's episodic. Everything up to Xen is done. And boy, is it done.

Get some image stabilization software in that thing pronto!

"but you never see this comment when anything positive is [posted about Google]. Hmm."

Someone obviously has never played http://type.method.ac/

Interesting note: the above comment (yours) was made possible by a generous grant from the department of understanding how quantum mechanics work, which is itself made possible by a donation from the mathematical equations foundation. Modern transistors wouldn't exist without quantum mechanics, and quantum mechanics

There are some say that handheld gaming is the future. Apple took handheld gaming and made it pretty awesome.

Ironic considering your name.

If he's actually found a pattern here, I'm going to start dancing for a very long time.

Yes. They could have called them "earbuds", a name which I find repulsive and disgusting.

No, I'm mocking you for being pedantic over something just because it isn't real. In Peter Pan, his shadow goes all over the place. If you hated that movie because of that, then you are not a hypocrite.

I think Apple has a patent on something like this...

Obfuscation. This way, even if you share some real information somewhere else, it won't be nearly as valuable, as the fake information here might contradict the other info.

That's not always the case. Take letters like A and W. Put them next to each other (AW), and you'll see that they actually overlap a little. It's important to keep in mind *how* you are measuring the distance.

Not really sure what that means. If you mean "uniform white space," then sure, maybe, I guess.

Anything that isn't correct is failing. :P

He used "obvious" with no qualification as to the scope. Default interpretation is that if something is "obvious," then that is referring to everyone, as that seems to have been his target audience. If something is obvious to you and only (necessarily) you, then you have to state that, as that's an abnormal use of

The comment just above yours.

That'd be more of a hack or an add-on than anything. Take it from a personality construct that used to work in Aperture's intelligence lab. One does not simply modify a neural network.