False. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/apple-secures-injunction-against-samsung-galaxy-tab-in-e-u/54459

Then why did he only have a $1 salary from Apple? If he was truly interested in money, why not have a regular salary?

Humanity has already solved this problem with children and guardianship. Apply the same basic principles, and you have a working framework. Any sufficiently complex artificially intelligent entity did not start out knowing what it does. It would have learned over time, just like any human child.

No, PayPal is basically an online bank that also just happens to support taking money out of your other bank accounts as well as a very popular online payment system.

Well duh. If your typical use of the Internet was knowingly breaking the law on a regular basis and disrupting the livelihood of innocent people, just about anything would feel better than that (that is, after you stop being a moron and realize that what you're doing is stupid).

So Apple didn't say it sucks. Apple says that it's very similar to their own.

Now you're assuming that Apple is influencing the court. This, again, is not "obvious."

You sort of just killed the joke.

It's penance for leaking that info about the iPhone 4S.

Obvious troll is obvious.

Are you saying they suck because they're responsible for this bit of Android "sucking" (they're not), or because they sort of slapped Google in the face with their comment?

Source?

It worked.

Think Before You Click™

You can call Apple a patent troll, but by no means can you say that they are an "obvious" one. It's just like those people that misuse "literally." No, you may not use it for emphasis. Bad bad bad.

"it is. that's science 101."

Am I the only one that noticed and was bothered by the off-sync audio?

"Like gravity, it is only a theory,"

You. Yes, you. Go away. This is cool.

"and that policymakers should therefore consider the risk of negative consequences."