level250geek
leggomyeggobatman
level250geek

Maybe that's because Ogre somehow managed to come across as more angry, aggressive, and offensive than the OP. Maybe it's because by responding in the way he did, he actually managed to paint an even worse picture of gamers than that of us being fat, greasy men. Perhaps its because most of us read what mesosuchus

Much like Jim Lee, Greg Capullo's Batman is a distillation. The signature on Capullo's work is that he incorporates—ever so slightly—elements of the Nolan's Batman: more visible armor and a rounder cowl among them. There's also the cartoony look of Timm and the dynamic posing of Adams there. He's pretty much the

Somebody buy this person a drink!

Consider the collector'scollector's edition? They sell out pretty quickly, so it's not like you can pick it up later at a cheaper price.

SJW existed before GG. Fair enough. But it certainly seems that GG popularized it.

My point was this: you responded by going off on a profantiy-laden, anger-fueled rant. You loaded up so many insults it felt like you were trying to win a contest. You whipped out a term invented and used predominantly by the GamerGate crowd. You came across as the kind of gamer that proves the negative stereotypes

Ya know, I was going to star your post but then you said SJW and took that hard right turn and I just couldn't.

Yes, you do have the right to respond to arguments and statements however you choose, and others have the right to respond to your response, and you can respond back, and repeat until the heat death of the Universe. This is why the whole, "you can say what you want, but I can say what I want too!" logic doesn't do it

Yes, you do have the right to respond to arguments and statements however you choose, and others have the right to respond to your response, and you can respond back, and repeat until the heat death of the Universe. This is why the whole, "you can say what you want, but I can say what I want too!" logic doesn't do it

Yes, you do have the right to respond to arguments and statements however you choose, and others have the right to respond to your response, and you can respond back, and repeat until the heat death of the Universe. This is why the whole, "you can say what you want, but I can say what I want too!" logic doesn't do it

My now-wife and I started playing WoW together when we were still just friends. We bonded a lot over that game. We learned a lot about each other, and I was going through a tough time and she helped me through, having some real heart-to-heart talks with me as we partnered up for quests.

I'm no lawyer, but I would think that if legal action had already been taken, a delay wouldn't help. They "broke the rule" before the deadline, and thus it may still count. Even though the game hasn't been published, they still went ahead and used Patton's name and likeness in the game's assets and (while I haven't

Made amazing. That is what you meant to say.

I'LL TAKE TWO.

Do you really think that the street view cars *only* take pictures of the street?

If you like this villain and you haven't read the most recent story arc in Mark Waid's current run on Daredevil, you really should. It was great, and saw the villain get what was coming to him.

It did make him immortal, but only if he stayed in the cave. Once he left the cave, he lost his immortality (hence why the knight had been there for so long).

I spent pretty much all day yesterday chugging away on Chapter 2 in the original game, despite having a brand new Wii U and lots of sparkly, shiny games from the Steam holiday sale to play. I got to a point where I hit a brick wall and realized that I had made a series of quest decisions that effectively cut me off

Guild Wars 2 is the best MMO I've ever played, and it may well be the best on the market. More people should be playing it. I hope this brings some new players into the fold. As of right now, the digital deluxe and heroic editions are 75% off on their digital store. Hit 'em up if you get a chance.

Redefining broadband doesn't do anything for the consumer. All it means is that companies wouldn't be able to label anything under 25/3 as broadband; that's it. So they offer that option and slap a $100+ a month price tag on it, and have everything else labeled as standard and value package or whatever. The ISPs rake