letstalkaboutit666
letstalkaboutit666
letstalkaboutit666

Yeah, I've heard lots of rumors about lots of celebrities regarding stuff they prefer to keep secret. Just because people may have heard the same rumors or maybe even if the rumor is true doesn't mean it should be broadcasted when the subject of the rumor wants to keep it secret. Roseanne talked about Dolly's

No that is literally what outing is.

So you may want to chill with that caps lock.

Tracie did a story about her secret tattoos a week ago. This is just a follow up to highlight her success of outing Dolly.

Yes, Roseanne is also at fault, but that doesn't mean Tracie had to participate and further publicize something Dolly seems to have preferred to keep secret. Also, Roseanne is Roseanne. I love her, but she prides herself on crossing lines and being a loud mouth. Tracie on the other hand is playing both sides; a

Way to out her, Tracie. Some hard hitting journalism chops you got there. You broadcasted something someone obviously wanted kept secret. Equality has been achieved!

Ha, sorry. I didn't mean to make a bigger thing out of your comment. And I'm not totally sure about many of my facts, let alone how muscle relates to butts, which is why I inquired about your comment. :)

Is that true? If her ass is real, that is, not implants, it's mostly muscle. When people with muscles age, their muscles don't droop. It's not like fat and muscle doesn't turn to fat. Someone doesn't need to even have muscle for all that long before it just kind of sticks around even when no longer working out.

As a feminist and a person with a keyboard, I have all the right to try to shape this site. Remember, all Gawker sites depend greatly on the comments, perhaps even more so than on the actual articles. I do have an ax to grind, Jezebel has gone down hill this past year. There's far less content about real social

Perhaps not but there has been, for months, post after post about how amazing everything she does is with a focus on how she's challenging unrealistic beauty standards.
http://jezebel.com/shailene-woodl…

Other Gawker sites don't put celebrities up on pedestals. In the Gawker family, that is a Jezebel thing. Also, Jezebel is based primarily on a single principal of feminist whereas no other Gawker site has an underlying philosophy/ideology. The rest of the Gawker sites are based on themes/interests; tech, sports,

I would also extend that to all celebrities, not just Shailene Woodley.

Hopes and beliefs, not hopes and dreams.

I completely agree. Which is why I'm not sure why Jez was ever so crazy about her.

Well you are right that most can read and operate technology but if that is all it took, most wouldn't sound as dumb as they do. Plus, if you're expecting anything intelligent from a late night show, you're mistaken. You'll never find it there.

Hey, you sound pretty intelligent, but for the most part, 22 year olds are insufferable with their know it all but completely ignorant attitudes. Celebrities are pretty much the same. I mean, they don't live according to the same boundaries and restrictions as most people.

Maybe you're new here, I don't know. But this supposed 'stupid' person was an amazing feminist and a breath of fresh air up until two years ago.... according to Jezebel that is.

Have you ever talked to a 22 year old? Now how many celebrities, especially on Letterman, intelligently discuss anything? Now think about the 22 year old celebrity on Letterman. My problem with Jezebel's love affair with her, that ended yesterday, is what were so many of you expecting? There is no celebrity hero so

You know, if this article was posted last week, when Shailene was Jezebels latest feminist celebrity crush, people's comments wouldn't be so snarky and critical. But now us feminist can rip her apart!!!!

You know... I'm thinking about your comment, trying to shape my own position as thoughtfully as possible and I just don't know.