Not sure that’s fair. A guy can tell you what he likes, but a woman has been with multiple partners and might be able to give better generalized advice. FWIW, I thought Vanessa’s advice hit all the right, um, spots.

I think you’re confused. My “no” was in response to the question of whether I’d be okay with having my medical records leaked. No. No I wouldn’t be okay with that.

Reductio ad Absurdum.

“If you’re talking to friends who jet-set as much as you, go to town talking about how great the couples massage was or how you loved the free Veuve Cliquot upon checking in or how shitty the turn down service was.”

Funny, because you cared right up until you got called out for being full of it.

“It felt more likely that Djok would advance deep into every grand slam than Rafa.”

Yes.

Except, as the article makes clear, HIPAA does not apply to reporters.

I think all of us would like our privacy respected, but (and this is high school civics stuff) we all sacrifice personal rights in the name of a functioning society. Actually, I’m quite glad that my personal interest (or yours) doesn’t solely determine whether an action is right or wrong.

This woman knows what she’s talking about. Of course, everybody’s preferences differ, but I’d highlight the following:

No. What’s your point?

I had an allowance at age 5. $1 per week. 75 cents was mine to do with as I pleased, but I was required to save 25 cents per week.

We don’t know, but we can’t discount the possibility that Schefter asked the source if he could publish the photo and his source said, “Sure. They can’t tie it to me.”

Maybe I’m missing something (I often am), but I don’t see an issue with Schefter’s behavior.

Not sure why you couldn’t find pictures. I googled “Federer Gold Jacket Wimbledon 2009.” Is this the “golden” jacket you guys remember him wearing?

This is the interview that put you off Roger Federer forever? What did he say that was condescending?

Ok, so I know you’re not Will Leitch. But, your response is exactly what Seth McFarlane would say, so I’m still not sure.

That is pitch perfect. I enjoyed it immensely. Thanks.

Yeah, what’s that all about? To shift the discussion for a minute, how was Nadal able to have such an advantage over Federer, while Federer was enjoying a more successful career. Just a match-up issue?

‘The [base]path of the righteous man[child] is beset on all sides by the inequities of the employed and the tyranny of productive members of society. Blessed is he who, in the name of kickball and goodwill (or other thrift shops), shepherds the Trustafarian through Flatbush, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and…