@MarcusMaximus: They aren't iPhones. They are technically authentic iPhone parts.

@jabber: It does have the Apple logo on the back—and if this was legal, don't you think it would've been done awhile ago? Foxconn makes this stuff exclusively for Apple.

@initZero: *cough*Albert Gonzalez*cough*

@D-Bomb: And he isn't even selling phones—just the exteriors.

How are these "Authentic White iPhones"? How about "Semi-Legal White iPhone Exteriors"?

@LeftClicker: Interestingly, though, he seems to be selling them with the Apple logo, which must violate some law. He also might have bought stolen parts; the origin is unclear except that "some guy" sold them to him.

@deesugar: It wasn't his to sell. The A4 processor inside the iPhone 4, iPod touch generation 4 and iPad is Apple's custom-designed hardware, which they do not license. Since he was building another product (since this isn't legally an iPhone) with their hardware and selling it, be was probably infringing on some of…

@Rob: Someone drowned, so we should ban water.

@bobby.tables: Thank you, Sir Robert'); DROP TABLE Students;—

@alek2407: Try clicking a link.

@Tills13: Gmail at least uses HTTPS constantly. With Facebook, you can use HTTPS, but it messes with chat and you have to manually add it to each URL.

@Tills13: If someone actually, literally, unbelievably is stupid enough and/or has the balls to tell me to contact them via Facebook on their résumé, I might hire them to take out the trash and have a weekly in-house comedy skit.

@Tills13: To be honest, there isn't any reason you should want Facebook or Google to have any more of your data—since they probably know more about you than you do. I don't know why someone would consider email a social tool; to be honest I get more mail from newsletters than humans. (Yeah. I know.)

Holy crap. I thought that picture was Photoshopped. Also, excellent tip! I might make use of it.

AND EXCELLENT PRIVACY!

Gmail: HTTPS/SSL.

When in the course of human events we decide 9pt Monaco is too large, we design Retina displays to replace our eyes that fail due to trying to use this font.

@justin.slay: >_<

@zombiept2: A site doesn't need to be "html 5 compatible" by which I assume you mean HTML5 standards–compliant to function on the iPad. As long as the HTML will roughly function (which his does unremarkably), the iPad's rendering engine—WebKit—should be able to interpret it.

@Samson Li: It's not just your eyesight; some people are reading with bad lighting and/or different dpi displays.