I doubt it: Apple didn't provide any insta-app SDK—even banning Flash apps—and there are still a shitload of crap apps. I think it has more to do with the popularity of the platform. Which this hopefully won't shift.
LeftClicker
leftclicker-old
@Wipeout: Huh. I would've guessed dynamic would expand, taking up your hard drive. Thanks.
"Dynamic is better for not taking up your hard drive but static should give you better performance."
I just an iPhone.
I just an iPhone. Edit: Aargh, my damn faulty internet connection duplicated this. Apologies.
Seriously? More money? Eight minutes of new footage? And what about the people—like me—who already bought the DVD and helped amass your fortune? This is ridiculous.
I am on the computer for WAY over that, yet everyone still looks for my help with boring, repetitive tasks. And I do them. (The tasks. Not the requesters.)
No. 1 looks like a custom-skinned Mario Kart.
And some hands with not-so-removed nail polish to the left? No coincidence at all!
@LegacyCrono: Thought you were talking about the game: [en.wikipedia.org]
@Firesphere: I don't play either, but EVE Online looks pretty frickin' awesome. I just wish they'd make a one-time pay, standalone, non-online oriented game with a plot.
Whoa, shit, Flux became $75 behind my back? Oh no wait, wrong app.
@LVP: Testing:
@Firesphere: Oh yeah? Wait till you hit the (seat) Eject by accident. (While you're playing WoW.) Then you're really royally screwed.
@InsanePenguin: The Kindle actually only recently became $190 (at least where I live), and I guess free 3G is pretty frickin' awesome, but must do some damage to the battery (yes, I know, the battery is fantastic anyway). And if they were $15, which, I know, would be less appealing to the consumer, publishers would be…
In Spanish and awesome
@Dr. Evil Genius: Guns of Summer: I don't get it.
No offense meant to anyone . . . but I'll pass on the reception effect graph based on data observed by Gaywood.