leaguesofourown
LeaguesOfOurOwn
leaguesofourown

He’s not!!! I hear this from progressives as well and it baffles the HELL out of me. Like... have you read his opinions? They’re just dripping with condescension and plain meanness. That’s not wit. He also argues from disgust a LOT, which sort of contradicts the restrained “laws, not men” readings that he swears he

Bit late, but this press release just arrived in my box from Larry Klayman.

You are correct that there were individual Plaintiffs who brought the case, but the case and the arguments were developed by a group called the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which is funded by a conglomeration that can be best described as “as evil as evil corporations get” and bankrolled by the Koch brothers. The

“And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

One woman said she had no idea the ramifications and when told lots of people were going to lose their healthcare she said she did not want to happen at all. Sounds like that Libertarian group recruited her with cash IMO

Well, in all seriousness he’s defended Taney’s legacy as Chief Justice.

The difference is that we are aware that this site includes biased opinions from the writers, unlike something like Fox “News” where they are claiming to be “fair and balanced.” There are times on Jez when I click on the links in the posts to read the mostly neutral version of the story because I want to get a

What I’m drinking tonight.

Yes, what is Anna doing here? She knows that young women read Jezebel. Protect the minds of your impressionable young women readers, Anna! Stop corrupting them with emasculating jokes about respectable old men and opinions cleverly disguised as news!!

... warning that their decision will echo in eternity

ACA upheld, FHA given this gift, and Scalia being mopey-snarky. All-in-all this is shaping up to be a good day.

You know which states would have suffered the most if this law was struck down? Conservative states. If Scalia would get his head out of his ass long enough to stop hating our president, he would realize that the majority just did the GOP a huge favor.

Scalia’s tears are delicious.

Scalia still thinks that the Dred Scott decision was the Supreme Court’s finest hour

“Six million people aren’t losing healthcare coverage and Scalia is throwing a baby tantrum. It’s a great day.”

Other big exciting news coming down from the Supreme Court today! Under the Fair Housing Act it’s enough to prove that a policy or practice has a disparate impact (ie the policy doesn’t have to be discriminatory on its face; if the policy has a disproportionately adverse impact on minorities it violates the FHA).