Yay! I have been ungrayed! Thanks KL!

Dead Man’s Curve

Exactly on almost all points. The only thing I don’t like about the UI is the no/yes buttons for road hazard confimation. Too small and too close together. They could probably also make better use of the real estate on some of the windows.

The first question that came to my mind when I saw this blog post. If it doesn’t integrate with Waze, it is NOT getting loaded. Lettuce know when that happens.

Wow, I didn’t see your reply until now. I’m such a noob at this thing. Please send me an email to rdcyclist at msn dot com. I would truly appreciate it!

Got a ticket on my motorcycle in southeastern Oregon on Hwy26 for going 94 in a 55. Oncoming radar. I was riding directly into the sun at 8:30pm riding one handed with my left shading so I could see where I was going. I truly didn’t (and don’t) believe I was going that fast but who’s gonna believe that? I was nice a…

You make this sound like a bad thing.

Pretty much...

“Analysis of the vehicle performance showed that Eta requires less than 198 watts of pedal power at 90 km/h...”

Holy shit! You got to ride in a Royale? I’m without words and that doesn’t happen often. Lucky git, you.

Exactly so.

Best “That Guy” thread ever. I imagine your quite a bit of fun at parties.

I get it! You get a pass then ‘cuz there’s no way to ignore that when a direct family member EDIT’s your local edition of “Pedantic Gits”. Just kidding. Sort of...

Exactly. There is always “that guy” popping up in the comment section of stories about re-creation cars. I call the yabbutt’s. Like this: Yeah but this (insert incredibly minute detail of construction) is done wrong so it’s not really accurate. Stavers gets to do that here...

Exactly.

I like how you think. I too would be all over that. It’s just a car afterall and we can fix anything!

Fuck! You’re right! Learn something new everyday:

Exactly so.

LOL ... or that. Sometimes I just like writing it to be as confusing as possible. It’s good to be successful once in a while. Thanks for the laugh!

So it should’ve been more smarter? That would be the same thing as “less dumb”.