layoffthehighheat
LayOffTheHighHeat
layoffthehighheat

If Harper is looking to pay homage to the Nationals 2015 season, I think I know what it is...

Some asshole stole Bartolo Colon’s belt and is showing it off in the background.

It’s the neck/chin crease/cleave that gets me. It looks like he might be undergoing mitosis.

I’m so utterly confused. Have you guys watched baseball lately? It’s boring. Hawk is a homer and an old man. Is there anything wrong with a sag-balls geriatric actively rooting for his team in the broadcast? I mean really, this man is a national treasure. Sure as hell beats listening to the Stone Pony ramble about

Jezebel reader I assume. Turning a non-gender issue into a gender issue because your tits are sore.

Watch out! It’s the revenge of the upper middle class educated middle-aged woman! Tell 'em girlfriend

oh look someone made a visual representation of every soon to be comment thread here

“The Mariners Just Can’t Stop Slappin Dingers” - U.S. Admiral, 1993, in Congressional Hearing in support of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy

Noah Syndergaard would have thrown a 95 mpher right into Correa’s back.

The infuriating thing about Hillary is for all her vaunted policy knowledge and sound judgment and history of leadership, she is incompetent at running her campaign. I am very, very worried that if Cruz wins the primary he will beat her in the general.

She was for subway tokens before she was against them.

I like Sanders, but this interview is pretty bad. He has always appeared the least terrible option to me and will remain so. Obviously Clinton mouthpieces like the Washington Post will excoriate him over it and no doubt this comment section aka Clintonland will whilst pretending only Sanders supporters shovel

it’s time to start applauding the big-time programs that have found ways to take the academics out of college.

“news”

How many times does Burneko have to point it out? He’s not asking for political bias or opinions or dissertation on the 2 party system.

No. The suggestion that people should vote for a candidate whose policy positions and record are repugnant to them, simply because that candidate has made them sufficiently fearful of all possible alternatives, is repulsive.

I’m not saying her logic is faulty. I’m saying it’s repulsive. It’s the logic that has permitted one of the two parties to define itself by the narrowest possible marginal differences between itself and the other for more than 20 years—since Hillary’s husband won in ‘92, in fact—meeting the interests of its putative

Dave McKenna.

Haha.

Nah, it’s still shitty. She’s saying vulnerable people can’t withdraw their support from the process when it assiduously refuses to represent them.