Does it also summarize long article titles for we don’t have to proof read them either?

This is actually a pretty decent explanation.

Ask your co-worker if you would field at cows corner, silly mid off, fully, or third man. He'll understand. 

Welcome to the cricket fold. Long-time American fan here.

As an American who works abroad, I have a much simpler system for Celcius):

I can’t help wanting to seem more of the crew in this alternative timeline. It made me nostalgic for Farscape. 

I'm with you, but using Haiti as your example is problematic due to the continued tradition of "restavek", which is widely viewed as the use of child slaves. 

Her acting credentials are bona fide. So is her talent. The issue is that you expect her as a woman to play an emotionally charged character in need of a male love interest to complete her (see, e.g., Wonder Woman). The brilliance of Captain Marvel is that she goes through self-discovery without a love story or other…

One thing that has been overlooked in the streaming era: I bet streams of Weezer’s classic albums go up every time they release an album, making them money off of people feeling nostalgic.

It’s been broken for a long time. I remember in 2007 when Todd Graham was coaching at Rice. He took Rice to its first bowl game in decades and negotiated a contract extension. While negotiating with Rice, he was excusing himself to go to the bathroom to negotiate with Tulsa where he had previously coached. Soon after…

One small gripe: The minimum on the Y-Axis on Tesla’s chart is 5%. If it was 0%, the difference would look less stark. It doesn’t mean that Tesla isn’t the lowest risk, but it’s a very misleading way of presenting data.

I would argue that the “meh”-ness of the first two Thor movies allowed them to take risks with the character. There wasn’t as much risk as with the tent pole characters, and they could see that fans loved the irreverence of Guardians. 

Any regrets about writing this article?

Remember, Trump also claimed that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a single vote.

This is not the proper way of looking at the asset from a business perspective. You used the car in order to get to work so, in effect, it is a productive asset (even though was likely a cost center).

The thing that bothers me about this is the inexplicable use of square brackets around @realDonaldTrump under the last quotation.

Also hard to argue against in light of the precedent established by the Comcast NBCUniversal merger a couple of years ago.

Totally uninformed hot takes on the 2x6 v. 3x4 controversy:

Now let’s talk about their taxes:

While we’re writing ridiculous parables to try to explain the world, I offer this: