I think it is obvious at this point Fiona is the "lead". They admirably do a good job giving all the Gallagher's "something" to do plot wise, but her story is the obvious main plot and she is the pillar that hold the family together. Almost every other character's plot is built on "how Fiona acts and feels abut it"

I know lots of women who get physical with other women who sleep with their husbands. One of the reasons you do not sleep with married people is the very real prospect of getting punched in the face. Writing it off as "male response" is a denial of reality, respectfully. This is especially true when you know the…

Nah, she has no power base without him. She marries him, she gets the vale and her own throne. She gets rid of Littlefinger she is Jon's sister forever

LOL! Is that you George?

This review is off the mark. We are in the end game now. The universe and storylines should contract, There is nothing alarming about it. Do we really need plate spinning at this point? I think the only intrigue left is Jamie/Cersei (will he finally cast off his evil sister and be a good guy?) and Sansa/Jon (she…

This show is still better then the Walking Dead. At least it is fun. They really did not explain that nuclear winter thing though, they are just jumping into the last book. Zach sets off one nuke and suddenly a nuclear war happens? That really is a huge plot hole. They say other missiles were fired..um, why and…

lol..yep. definitely

it was very good, but far from perfect. The gossipy neighbors did not work and it was unbelievable people would talk to police like that. Perry being Jane's rapist was a little too much. Plus, Jane coming to town really had nothing to do with what happened to Celeste. Her arc of leaving Perry had nothing to do…

yes, that was clearly an intentional fake out

Agree to a point. I do not blame them for Perry being the killer, but if he was Jane's rapist, that is just unbelievable. They did make it at least sort of ambiguous since they never "say" it, but it is heavily implied.

Yeah, the whole arc of that part of the story made no sense. This show stood out by the performances and the plot. The larger narrative really did not make any sense at all. I said it elsewhere, but the talking catty neighbors were unbelievable. People do not act that way.

It was very ambiguous. You could definitely take it as Perry was Jane's rapist. They certainly played it that way, but it was never said. But you can equally take it as she tensed up and had that dream sequence because she saw Perry was just another violent man.

I think Ed was exactly what they made him out to be, a "nice" guy who Madeline loved, but really was not in love with. For her to be pining over an ex 15 years ago and cheating with another guy, Ed figured it out and the story underlined it..he was not a guy Madeline could ever get "hot" over. They also just stopped…

My only thought is because she should not be married with a kid and wants to be a free-spirited bisexual, and was until she conformed..which is kind of the American meaning of "Gypsy"

tell me why she is doing all of this? That is the main problem. The show is soo opaque you cannot get a motivation. Is she a bully? A manipulator? Why does she want Syd and Sam to be together so bad at the end? Was she grooming Allison to be her next Melissa? It never tells up why she is the way she is..so the…

SPOILER-ISH REVIEW

no its literally not. The statute exempts information. It is only cash or cash equivalence. Try again

so what?

LOL there is literally no crime and nothing here

He didn't solicit it..he was contacted and went to see her..which is more like entrapmant