lawdog2303--disqus
lawdog
lawdog2303--disqus

Night King: "well, we have an impressive army and have been marching back and forth for years because we have no way of breaching the magic wall and the entire south can just do nothing and we are screwed":

The idea that a 120 pound woman can actually hurt a guy is such a trope you almost have to suspend disbelief anymore to enjoy any superhero show or movie. Example..Scarlet Johannson in ANYTHING. Any guy more than twice her size would probably laugh if she punched him..or it maybe would leave a mark at best. But

This review is the most PC SJW crap I ever read. Its a shame this reviewer cannot separate his politics from an objective review of a TV series. Its a comic book show, guy! Relax..a girl getting evil is a standard trope. Its almost like its a PC sin for any woman character to be evil in 2017. Isn't that just as

I was being sarcastic..you proved my point, moron

I do not need validated by internet trolls

its a comment section, not a report

you sound smart in your name calling..is that all you got?

they don't

you sound intelligent

yawn

They are not respected, they are a far left hate group who slanders people

you sound intelligent

yeah, I was wrong..they still labeled him a hater and apologized. So I will admit I misremembered what they labeled him..so will you admit they routinely label people haters and extremists who do not deserve it?

Basically, you are admitting yo are in a bubble and will not read anything that you disagree with. I read this site and I disagree with it..but I have intellect and reason and I am not a baby like you who only wants to be told stuff you like

RCP and networks consider them mainstream, not just me

They labeled him a hater, they do not "just print his words" and you admit they apologized. That does not change the fact they tried to label someone an extremist who was running for president and was african-american because they disagree with his views. They also label muslims who decry islamic extremism as

Your opinions are not relevant to whether a site is mainstream

yes, they are. You saying no does not refute facts. Their articles are cited in Realclearpolitics everyday

its a mainstream publication no matter the resume of the person you cite, which I have no idea about. Its contributors are well known mainstream conservatives

Yeah, says the people whose wit and argument skills is telling me to f*ck off