laurynmb
Lauryn
laurynmb

How is google being evil by not censoring their search results?

The jury acted swiftly and with conviction. No need to insult them with assumptions of disregard for the lives of the victims or the suffering of their families.

She was very close to her family. But it was well known in Corpus Christi her dad was not that supportive of her English pop music transition and resented her husband’s support of her. They have retained a tight control over image to protect it from exploitation. It’s so horrible they can’t agree how to present her

Sorry but not sorry at all. Burqas are meant to demean women and subject them to misogynistic rules. Women get punished for getting raped in societies that make them wear burqas. Burqas represent truly awful male dominance and subjugation.

Could you just not for a bit. Thanks.

GROAN! Are you serious!? Aren’t you embarrassed yet? Every article you have a fuck up. Every freaking time. And these aren’t just typos. They actually change the context of the article. Please reevaluate being a writer or a “reporter” or whatever you are trying and failing to be.

Taylor Swift being a high end cat burglar would explain so many things.

Thanks, I knew she had done something that really pissed me off but couldn’t remember it. And also such a minor thing but when Indianapolis hosted the Super bowl in 2012 (yes Indiana is lame, but Indianapolis is pretty cool and we actually put on a great event) she went on and on about how lame the city was and how

Something Jez writers don’t seem to understand is that taking criticism like an adult and not a sullen teen is part of being a professional in any field. Grown women acting bitchy or sassy in response to facts or general discourse is not cute and definitely not a good look. Probably best to get used to it before Jez

It is purely this fact that prevents any meaningful interviews of powerful women. Half of the articles in Jez are so femanist they nearly advocate for a world without men. The articles that follow these are usually the tabloid-roundup or something about clothes.

If Hillary did interview, would they ask her to divorce

Don't actually address it or anything

AMEN. Soooo many times have Jezebel writers have been called out on anti-feminist shit, and this has been the most consistent response. Its absurd. Jezebel are way overvaluing their influence and credibility in feminist discourse and media. I mean, they could change gears at any time, but then they’d have to

You’ve every right to bring this up. Historically, Jezebel — the website, I should stress — has taken a feminist-when-convenient stance. It’s been most noticeable whenever they’ve gotten themselves into hot water over the years: in those circumstances, they’ve been mighty quick to correct commenters who label it a

I feel bad for Anna... It’s gotta be tough to not be able to lay out at the beach for long with such thin skin.

I’m pretty sure a lot of readers are also adamant that Jezebel is not a feminist blog. A blog for whining and pointing out every single possible infinitesimal moment of someone somehow having been wronged and therefore super butthurt, sure. But feminist? Not for this old feminist broad. I read it for the unintentional

It wasn’t a criticism, it was an observation. I can recall seeing Jez writers/editors claim that, while Jez is directed toward woman, it is not a feminist website. If this is no longer the case and Jezebel now embraces ths “feminist” label I would be more than happy to stand/sit corrected.

is it wrong?

“Can a feminist blog and the first female nominee really not have a serious, substantive discussion?”