Yeah, this article clearly wasn’t even remotely well-researched, and seems more interested in edgy shit-slinging than actually understanding anything.  

This is so riddled with errors, how can anyone seriously put their name on something so badly researched and misinformed? Do you seriously just not care about getting things right, are you THAT desperate for page-views that you’d rather sling shit?

So what you’re saying is that you have literally no standards?

Or you could inform yourself before you talk out of your ass about stuff that’s not even your business, but hey, how can you stroke your ego doing that?

If works signed by Tolkien were lost, then why is anyone even talking about King? King is adequate, but Tolkien is Tolkien.

“a great example of what Moffat does best: complex plotting.”

 I mean, after Rogue One: A Stardust Memory, they’d have to have a straight-up Zaku walk by in the background before I’d be surprised at their audacity.

Maybe it’s the constant idiocy from fuckstains like you.

You’re fucking delusional.

Do you actually not understand that fiction can be racist?

Do you think that this statement is in any way, even remotely relevant?

Do you not know the difference between Mobile Suits and Gundams?

“That’s not an ethical issue though”

Lacking any substantial criticism, you’ve decided to rant about something you’re imagining. You take this lack of criticism and shouting about imaginings to make you, what, insightful? You’re just making it obvious that you’re a moron.

That wouldn’t make you shitty, thing is, some people like to think when watching movies.

Why do people insist on not understanding what that line means?

In these grim times we are all our boi Guzma.

Oh shit that reminds me I need to start up Roko’s Basilisk Awareness Day.

... Yeah, considering you didn’t understand what was wrong with being a white nationalist, I don’t see why anyone should give one iota of a shit about your deranged, moronic opinions.

Explain to me what you think makes this comment acceptable.