lantern123
lantern123
lantern123

It was gross. We all know what happened in 2003. We also know what happened in 2005. To top that all off, we certainly know what happened in 2011. After that, we see what happened 7 months ago as well.

His legacy was seen clearly yesterday. As scores of journalists, broadcasters, former teammates, friends and associates poured tears and emotion into the public arena over his loss.

As I look around and see scores of young women eschewing responsibilities in the home, having no idea how to cook or clean while having the attitude that it is beneath them, outsourcing the care of their children and leading the destruction of marriage by being the primary filers for divorce, it has become apparent

No, “too soon” means “too soon.”  We can certainly as fans and detractors of Kobe Bryant discuss the rape allegation in 2003.  But, in discussing that it cannot be forgotten that by 2005 the criminal case was dropped and he made restitution through a legally binding agreement made to her on advice from her counsel. 

Kobe Bryant was accused of rape in 2003. In 2005 the criminal case was dropped and he made restitution to the plaintiff based on a legally binding agreement with her and her legal counsel. He lived 41 yrs. This was only one incident in his life, and she was only one woman in the scores of women that he loved, raised,

I am not sure religious conservatives are the issue here.  

I don’t see the benefit in this amendment as I don’t see where women are not equal. They are different.

Just a reminder...America is 63% white. Yes, we as white people like some diversity and are interested in the stories of minorities, but not really. We like white people, characters and vampires. We don’t necessarily want Nick Fury to be black or Ice Man to be gay or Kamala Khan to be a huge part of the next phase of

Why not both?”

Please, this is faux outrage.  The author is Puerto Rican.  She did what any writer does, research.  It’s fiction.  White people love it.  Don’t read it if you don’t want to.

He gains nothing by talking to the FBI.  a) Epstein is dead b) He’s British and has no responsibility to a US investigative branch c) In many areas of the world the girl in question was at the age of consent d) Bill Clinton is a far better target e) Best to keep one’s mouth shut voluntarily

Clinton had Epstein killed.  Like it or not the girl in question was 17 at the time and in many places in the world legal age of consent.  He was a bachelor, or at the worst looking to score.  I think they are wasting their time with him when they should be steadfastly focused on Bill.

To one woman he was a husband. To 4 he was a father. To one he was a son. To two he was a brother. To some he was a friend. To others a colleague. To a few he was a mentor. To others he was an associate. To some he may have been a lover. To one, he was an assaulter or rapist. But, on many scales, to women he was an

This is the land of second chances. We have opportunities within the criminal justice system to find justice. He provided restitution. Let’s not adjudicate Colorado over again. He was not criminally liable and he paid his civil penalty. They both moved on. Let them both have peace until the Day of the Lord.

Let’s also not forget that just months before she was hospitalized for mental issues, was excited to see him, broke protocol to visit his room alone, had sex with another prior to her exam, was advised by council to avoid the criminal trial due to the evidence and did poorly in a mock trial.  This was not open and

Trump’s indiscretions are old news and has done nothing but keep promises and uphold his responsibilities as president during his term. He has earned a 2nd with hard work, sound decision making and many successful policies put into place.

They will, at least in the memories of all that love them, be young and together for as long as they are remembered here.  I hope that they are together in eternity, with God and not damned.  If any of you reading this question your eternal destiny, don’t let their deaths go without self-reflection.  Turn to Jesus.

I think just as we demanded the utmost professional on-court performance from Kobe as an NBAer, he demanded of his pilot and flight crew.  That they failed him by flying yesterday is the type of mistake you can’t take back.

It is really about humanity.  People died.  People real people cared about in their daily lives b/c of closeness of relationship not fodder for gossip pages.  The fact so many “professionals” got it wrong is tragic.  

To me, Sonmez was particularly cruel b/c while it is important to remember someone in their totality, that can be done in times of reflection not as a lead in the aftermath of their death. Let’s also not forget that Kobe was never criminally tried and he provided restitution through a lawyer drafted and court approved