Nice try, but you’re wrong. The protesters in Ferguson and Baltimore didn’t show up with rifles saying “We’ll open fire if you try to make us leave”. Huge difference.

Idiot and terrorist are not mutually exclusive terms....these white folksmare both.

102% agreed

Also to answer your question, on the backs of slave labour.

It's not what the "terrorists" are doing.....it's how the federal gov't and the media is handling it that offends me. 12 year old black kids in national parks with pellet guns are killed on sight in this country; apparently, fake military personnel that take over federal grounds are jamokes that shouldn't be taken…

ter·ror·ism (n): the use of violence and or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

This is a text book definition of terrorism, what more do you need me to play up?

We don’t need to go in with guns blazing, but that building does belong to the government, work does need to happen there, and some number of people are out of a job right now. Whether or not they took over an important building is immaterial.

I could get into a detailed discussion on why it is important to label these people as terrorist, but I truly do feel you would willfully ignore any statements I made due to that “Liberals” shade you just threw.

I live in Chicago, the city where the mayor told the leads of the black community if riots took place (riots compared to protests) there would be consequences for those communities. Where are the consequences for these people? I appreciate the word art (I enjoyed “dorks in their best Sunday camo”), but they are armed…

I feel like they DO want a fight, even if they’d prefer not to actually get hurt, because it would finally give them any sliver of evidence that the evil government really is against them.

They don’t want a fight.

Exactly. Fuck that jamoke shit. In this country a 12 year old in a park with a pellet gun is deserving of an after the fact state sanctioned summary execution but a bunch of guys tooled up for war occupying a government property is deserving of a “Aww... shucks, boy will be boys.”? No. No.

kind-sounding sarcasm helps me deal with the stupid. something absurd like “Yes, all women are liars.” or “Following the law is so hard.” with sad voice and condescending arm pats before inserting headphone in ears and tuning it all out.

You could get a T-shirt made that says “I understand that you’re mad, and since you don’t want to believe someone you thought was a good person turned out to be horrible your brain resists being angry at him. It’s a defense mechanism. In time you will accept that this is his fault, but until then you have to stop…

Some logic that permits them to think an over privileged white/orange guy with bad hair can make america great again.

Of course he’s surprised. White male, who is also a cop???? Pretty much untouchable in most situations. If it had been less than 5 accusers he’d have walked for sure.

i. Accusing someone of sexual assault (real or faked) is not a route to any kind of money, but rather a lifetime of victim-blaming.

Quote: “Pray for his family!”

yes, much better than “protecting the brotherhood” or what the fuck ever

It’s sad that we’re relieved the PD made a perfectly reasonable statement.

On a positive note, the Oklahoma City Police Department’s statement on Facebook: