Wait, wait, wait - this movie is about a non-elected American President going nuke crazy and taking over the world (much to the shock of South Korea) and then Bruce Willis comes in and saves the day over a non-offensive poprock soundtrack?
Wait, wait, wait - this movie is about a non-elected American President going nuke crazy and taking over the world (much to the shock of South Korea) and then Bruce Willis comes in and saves the day over a non-offensive poprock soundtrack?
I like your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter
*grin*
*applause*
Negative, sir, I am a meat popsicle
I'm really pleased to see the replies to me have been acknowledging that it's misunderstanding of the basic theories, not the rejection of evolutionary behaviour theories themselves. I actually wholeheartedly agree with your comment, which is why I try to present a more informed point of view on evolutionary…
Thank you for the link.
Janeway's edition in the Captain's Table "Fire Ship" really stuck with me - it's very much a character study so it does stand alone very well I think
Thanks for the reply. I appear to have vomited some kind of thesis in partial defence of evolutionary psychology below . . . please, feel free not to read. I just can't quite bring myself to delete it.
No, it's just dreadful science. It's a great film and great idea, etc. but there's little to no scientific basis to Gattaca. "We magically know phenotype odds" is a better descriptor of the science there.
Out of interest - what do you study and to what to level? What's your experience with evolutionary psychology post docs?
It's not displacing anywhere near enough water to dehydrate you though. You could drink nothing but tea or coffee whenever you were thirsty and suffer no ill effects (asides from a caffeine headache. It's the caffeine that makes it less healthy)
It's incredibly sad and mortifying to the gaming community that some people have to be told to calm it the hell down if they're new parents, but I don't see any other proactive way to address this.
The face test is a well established methodology and a lot is known about the variance expected in a population in response to that test.
This is about the only intelligent thing in this whole comment section.
I'm similar to you in that respect (why anyone would willingly bite into a tomato is beyond me). When I started my research I found an interesting little sub-group of child behaviour researchers who found that some children are highly tactile-sensitive. These children can't bear scratchy clothes, labels and often have…
—not being able to build a nightstand, or using the word "nightstand"? Real men call it a "that table thing."
THAT is going on my next welfare lecture. *applause*
They were lepers - you know, socially exiled and hated by all?
I would call myself a writer. I presume he means kill all your wolves.