kzap333kinja
kzap333
kzap333kinja

Oooh, I didn't know that.
That's exciting, I'm more interested in the central mystery now I know it's not going to be strung out with twists for 22 episodes.

I re-watched it recently and boy was it such a shame, it only really fell apart in the last act, the pacing was ridicules before that but still enjoyable.
Going in with the knowledge that there were heavy re-shoots and re-edits makes it more disappointing because you can see all the things they got right under the mess.

What do they think of her pro-choice stance?

Well it's going to be a BBC series, which I'm excited for.
Although my expectations will be hard to meet and they'll probably need some kind Netflix/Amazon co-production deal to get the right budget.

I remember when my father read the books to me as a child I started to loose interest around the middle of the third book, which only really picked up again near the end.
It's the one I have the least clear memories of and always thought it was just because of my short attention span as a child.
The same thing happened

Yup.
It's a "Netflix Original" here in the UK and everywhere outside the US I presume.

Don't you mean Archie-ness?

I'm planning on catching up on Netflix, I saw the the first episode and wasn't super taken with it but it will be nice to easily watch something and be mostly in-sync with the AV Club's reviews for once.
I might be strange but the idea of spin-offs and a whole "universe" actually puts me off a bit.
20 episodes a season

I wouldn't call most democrats "liberal", they're a center-right party it's just that their main competition is far right.
I'm not American but I remember a lot of criticism of Obama and his government after the Edward Snowden leaks.

I remember hearing about another trailer doing that years ago, I guess it was allowed then so everyone started doing it.
I suppose you technically "win" a nomination, at least that's what someone at Advertising Standards though.

Yay! Glad someone brought of Last of the Innocent, surprised it was this far down the comments section.
It's weird they're doing an official Archie dark-murder-mystery when that comic already exists (heck maybe they used it as reference to pitch the show), I guess an adaption of that comic would be a far harder sell

I'm not sure where your point is. People should boycott every film with a white lead character or none at all?
Clearly it's a case of picking your battles, you can't boycott everything so start with adaptions that change/reinterpret the ethnicity of a character to white and once there's more diversity there move to

I think people understand what an adaption is they're just annoyed at the lack of diversity. Hollywood so rarely cast actors-of-colour in their original films to not do it in adaptations of work from those cultures either is a huge indication of a larger problem.

"However, movies need to make money. And one of the main factors to make money is the actors/actresses in them… …and its not something that's going to be fixed by boycotting"
Surely that's exactly how it's going to be fixed, Hollywood are just playing a number game if enough people boycott un-diverse films then

You can say that again.
We watched the first film as part of regular "bad movie night" and as well as being less entertaining and harder to riff jokes on than expected, I actually thought it was rather tame in both in sex and bondage (if I remember correctly there was only one quick bondage montage and the final

From what I remember Drive isn't that gory except for a tiny handful of select moments, which admittedly are extreme. You could probably watch the first 45 minutes before there was a drop of blood*.
If you're worried about torture-porn style relentless gore/violence there isn't really any in that film.

Ummm… Yes.
I've been waiting for a TV anthology adaption of Criminal (which could be a mix of some straight comic adaptions and some originals stories in that universe) but this sounds just as good if not better!
Hopefully this makes up for Gotham not being the Gotham Central adaption I was hoping it would be.

Actually it's the other way round, if only people with gluten sensitivities purchased gluten-free food then they wouldn't be able to mass-produce it and prices would increase not to mention the variety and availability would decrease as well.
I don't mind the gluten-free "fad" because it does actually help those with

Which in itself is an ad.
It's like on Spotify when it says "the follow 30 minutes are ad-free thanks to the following sponsor" they're not really "ad-free" then because they just advertised the sponsor, by that logic everything is "ad-free" when you're only counting the time between the ads.
"The next 10 minutes of NBC