I guess? I don’t personally love the X and I would have liked the 3 better as a full on hatch - but my personal opinions aside all the designs including the S are really just “unoffending”. If I wanted to I could pick apart the S as well.

I mean. Neither of the other Teslas set the world on fire with their design. At best the Model S is “handsome” but was never particularly striking.

I think it depends on who you ask. People may like the C63 better but I think even the people that like it know it’s more of a muscle sedan than a sports sedan. As far as the quadrifolio I think the only in depth review I saw was road and track and although they thought the Alfa was exciting initially and better…

Sounds better as the original “penny wise, pound foolish”

As easy as it is to make this argument, there’s a reason the M3 still wins those comparison tests every year and pretty much the only car that beats the M3 is an older model M3. And I’m a Porsche guy so...

It’s not a huge logical leap when of the 4 main characters the two asians were not only making less but so much less that even with a raise they didn’t match their other two white male costars. This might have half a leg to stand on if the costars weren’t also C-list actors at best.

Yeah. I don’t get the collective media frenzy. The Model S is old at this point. Everything pretty much rests on the model 3. If less S’s sell that’s probably not great for overall profitability but also opens up headroom to fill up the massive waiting list they have for the Model 3. If they start producing 20k model…

You forgot “Unless it’s an aircooled Porsche, then ‘hotrod’ builds are worth orders of magnitude more than the stock car”

Jesus. 131k performance car engine? Cool idea. But this isn’t worth 10k much less 21k.

When I was in college like 15 years ago. I casually played CS1. One summer I lost my job and for a few months I was playing easily 6-10 hours A DAY. I went from being a pretty good player to regularly going 50+ kills and single digit deaths on public servers. I ended up getting banned from a server I had played on for…

You’re right. I’m a jerk for judging him.

No one is interested in what minor web blog you “edit”. And given the Wall Street Journal’s headline this morning included comments about congress “waivering” on their support for a healthcare bill, I’m not sure I’m impressed by your “profession” anyway.

No Crono Trigger, no way.

I’m not sure you know what hyperbole means. Falling back on a trite observation like “hyperbole” for things that are actually documented is pretty weak. As to whether or not we’d agree on things. I’m not sure I care.

Lol. Even if he wasn’t Prince Harry, he wouldn’t be regular in any sense of the word.

It’s pretty hard to feel that bad for a profession whos average range starts anywhere from the 170s to over 200k depending on which research you look at. Their malpractice premiums aren’t what they were, and, for what it’s worth, doctor salaries have been rising since ACA.

I’ll take their salaries plus all their costs and still be in the elite earners in the US. Again. I’m not saying it’s underserved. I’m just saying it has very little in the way of market pressures to influence it.

Yes. That’s fine. They should still be subject to either market pressure or regulatory. Right now either’s impact is marginal.

That’s fine too. That’s why I said market OR regulatory pressures. Just pick one. Right now it’s socialized cost and privatized profit. Doesn’t work.

LOL - that’s pretty funny math. 8.6% of costs in a system with inflated costs can still be pretty high. Here’s another one which takes actual salaries adjusted for PPP. I’m pretty sure it’s based on data from the same organization as your article. http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/02/charts-day-doctor-pay-amer…