But they’re buying into BMW precisely because that badge has value. And that value is that it’s perceived to be sporty, a proper drivers’ car. Even if they don’t need that, that’s what they’re paying for. But when the car itself turns into something completely different than a drivers’ car then that badge ‘promise’ is…
This is a terrible argument. As long as BMW builds cars that appeal to the “core” brand buyer they don’t run that risk. A very small minority of people think in the narrow minded fanboy sense you are talking about. Look at Mitsubishi, it has moved away from the Lancer line and has seen some great sales success. No…
What this means, is that the likelihood of my next purchase being a BMW is less than it otherwise might have been. But that’s OK. There are still plenty of car makers who understand performance enthusiasts. Oh, and ever since the ‘i3’ came out, they really should stop calling their product ‘the ultimate driving…
Muscle cars have plenty of ride height, beefy tires, and plenty of rear-drive power. Sounds like a perfect…
So what’s the flagship of their sedan line? I’d argue it’s the CTS-V. Which is indeed rear wheel drive. As is the ATS. No, sorry, there aren’t many front-drive Cadillacs out there, and the ones that are, aren’t top of the line.
Does this look “front wheel drive” to you?
Regarding #2: If the shop will not stand behind their work simply because of the age and mileage of my car, then why the hell should they expect my business?
how republican.
Except that overstates things. Many creators on Kickstarter represent that people making pledges will receive the product(s) described. As such, there is, at minimum, a potential argument that the creator is bound under a theory of promissory estoppel, and in the most egregious cases there is a potential argument for…
America was named after a person named Amerigo >_>
You’re a fucking dumbass.
Each issue should be two pages; they find out about a problem, a giant hand is shown squashing something.