kumicho
Kumicho
kumicho

But this is the freest part of the “free market”. According to the laws of supply and demand, and maximizing profits, I should be able to sell the same product to different people at different prices. If I can make a widget for $10, I would maximize profits if I could sell one to Person A for $11 (the most he’d be

Yeah, plain cheese curds are....  OK I guess, but fried they’re *delicious*.  

Culver’s only uses fresh, never frozen beef.  And their prices are about what In N’ Out is.  

Wait. Have you never had fried cheese curds? And you’re shit-talking them anyway? Fried cheese curds are delicious.

Ugh. I love cars, but I *hate* car ownership. The sheer cost of it all, and the ridiculous amounts of money that is literally thrown down the drain is just astounding. AAA’s true cost for new car ownership is $10k. Per year. Per car. Even if you just figure on half that amount, so let’s say $10k/year for two cars.

There’s always option 3, don’t buy something for $60k if you only have $60k in savings.

You can feel free to laminate your card, since if you need a booster you’ll (probably) need a different card anyway.  Or you can just go to the place where you got your vaccine and get a replacement card.

Meal Team Six?

If you think abortions are bad, don’t have one. This is about a legal and safe medical procedure that should be available to all women, regardless of where they live or whether they have the money to get one.

I just noticed that Paul Walker in his GT-R beats a Supra, an RX-7, and an S2000, ie three of the famous car “personalities” from the original. I’m assuming it’s intentional?

Yeah, it’s somewhat easy to do if you don’t put much down, since taxes, title, registration, fees and depreciation can hit you all at once when you drive the car off the lot, but that’s usually relatively minor. The bigger issue is when you roll negative equity from your current loan in to a new car and then you’re

Yeah, I went and googled it, and it appears that you’re only entitled to replacement value, not what you owe.  So, buy gap insurance if you’re that much upside down on your vehicle...

Would love to see that written down somewhere. The person who destroyed the asset only has to replace the value of that asset. Think about it this way:

I can’t wait till F10 when the FBI/CIA/whatever desperately needs Cena for some reason and he’s forced to join up with Dom in a wacky and utterly implausible mission where they (against all odds) realize that family is everything and they should team up and take down the bad guys together.

So, honest question, do none of these idiots ever go out and try this shit on an empty road in the middle of nowhere, or in a deserted parking lot first? I’ve never had a vehicle with more than 1/4 of this horsepower, and yet I’ve spent plenty of time in deserted parking lots when it snows so that I know how my car

But he wasn’t racing against anyone. There was no other car, and he wasn’t trying to set a time either, and no actual competition. He just gave it too much gas at the wrong time and place.

It’s not the other driver’s fault that you owe far more on a car than it’s worth. That driver just has to pay to replace what he (or she) broke, and that’s the value of the vehicle. If you’re an idiot and owe $60k on a $40k truck, that’s your problem.  It wouldn’t be fair to make the other driver pay more just because

This is the issue with the “sharing” economy, in that it lowers the cost for some which means that it increases the cost for everyone else. I’m a guy. A reasonably in-shape guy. I’ve never felt uncomfortable in a ride-share, or meeting up with someone to rent borrow their car via Turro, or sleeping in a stranger’s

I would pay $4,750 for a Spitfire in this condition.