I always get weirded out when people do this. Like...come on, you’re just trying to be fake-provocative. Has anyone, in the history of ever, demanded that Internet strangers explain a musician’s catalog to them and walked away with a newfound taste for said music?
Let’s get this Catch-22 out in the open.
They don’t have compassion for this woman, because the contents of uterus > woman. When I tried to impress on a (white dude) coworker that women will suffer and die without abortion access, he said “good. They should suffer.”
No we can’t. That’s the problem. Pro Choice people see a troubled young girl, desperately in need of help, failed by draconian cuts of vital social services.
So often pro-lifers present the issue as a choice between abortions and no abortions. It is not. It is a choice between safe, legal procedures and a fucking horrorshow of misery and desperation.
this is what happens when help is not available.
this is what happens when help is not available.
Remember that SNL skit maybe a year ago when middle aged men meet their future wives, who turn out to be children when they walk out?
“I am the only one who knows who the finalists are”
That’s Melissa Mathison.
Everyone else seems to think this is a great thing, so am I the only one skeeved out by the fact that a much older 34 year old ~married~ man took advantage of a drunk/high teenage girl? Like if someone said Chloe Grace Moretz and Seth Rogan smoked weed together and had sex while filming Neighbors 2, that would not be…
I’m sorry, but who among us would not fuck Harrison Ford, especially Han Solo-Harrison Ford? It is for this reason (as well as murder Hitler when he was just a shitty art student, and someone else I won’t mention in case the Feds are watching) I would build a fucking time machine. To fuck Han Solo/Raiders of the Lost…
Besides the taste and texture, what’s so bad about bananas?
“Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he’s never run a federal agency. The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency.”
IT IS NOT NATE SILVER’S FAULT THAT PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND PROBABILITIES. He gave Trump a higher chance of winning the presidency than the Cubs had of coming back and winning the World Series after Game 4 and we literally all JUST saw that happen. He doesn’t conduct the polls, he aggregates them, and there was no way…
Yeah, he’s a weird scapegoat in this saga. Flash back a week and a half ago and there were people all over the internet (including on this family of websites) writing pieces about how he was being way too bullish about Trump’s chances. Now, we’re blaming him for not being bullish enough...
Silver constantly warned that this election was different given the volatility in the polls and the large amount of undecided voters. He also warned that there was a significant possibility that Trump would win the Electoral College, but would lose the popular vote. Nate Cohn at the Upshot, however, was completely…
Nate Silver’s model was the only one which gave Trump a good chance of winning. Take it up with the Huffington Post and Sam Wang; they gave Clinton close to a 99% chance of winning....
“I would be very careful about exercising your First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Free speech in a Trump administration extends only to fawning praise, not to criticism or dissent of any kind. You knew this when you voted us in.” -said the scorpion to the fucked democracy.