who exactly was this steam’s most anticipated game for?

Guess you could say the folks dense enough to buy this thing were only born... The day before.

Sure, I’ll watch a roided up Zac Efron do some wrasslin’.

Since Kotaku can’t be bothered to list platforms on the year’s most important article about new game announcements, here ya go:

Yeah I went from BG3 to it and then from it to Cyberpunk 2.0 and its just doesn’t compare to either

Honesly if it were ugly it may be more fun.  Its just boring

I don’t know - if I’m Bethesda I’d be concerned that Skyrim a 10year old+ game has more players than my two month old latest release. And that Fallout 4 has the same amount of players which is what almost 10 years old? Those are not great metrics.  

I found the game kind of meh. It had some interesting aspects that were mostly counterbalanced by boring and/or tedious elements. I get the “mixed” status on steam because that is right where I’d put it. I gave up about 25 hours in cause it just wasn’t holding my attention.

Right. The collective aneurism from the general public and press coming to terms with the obvious is astounding. Take the same product, remove the Bethesda name and absurd hype, and it would’ve been forgotten and dismissed within a month.

While this is true, the biggest rebuttal to this is that people are sinking hundreds of hours in solo runs of BG3. I have almost 500 hours and I have yet to play multiplayer. And yet it’s not a live service game. Sometimes things are just fun, and you want to continue to enjoy them. Starfield isn’t bad, I thought what…

I hope Dan Stapleton is a reasonable asshole over his 7/10 review being incredibly on-point once the initial awe wears off. The weeks of people digging up his old DNF review and shitting all over him for daring to note that Bethesda made an impressively large and otherwise pretty ok game that feels a bit dated in the…

Because the game is derivative, repetitive, ugly, and boring?

Not only was going to the moon an incredible feat of science and engineering, it was also incredibly risky. Everything from takeoff(they strapped themselves to hundreds of thousands of gallons of kerosene and liquid oxygen), landing on the moon, taking off from the moon and rejoining with Columbia, and then reentry to…

“The astronauts weren’t bored when they went to the moon”

Came here to say something similar.

The Kingdom of Heaven Director’s Cut is genuinely a different film, and deserves that spot on the list with a bullet.

It’s literally proven science, and has been for seventy years.

Sorry, you’re an ignorant fool who’s being willfully deceived by rich, greedy people who have zero regard for your and your family’s future or health.

Yeah, imagine how many shit overly heavy, thirsty crappy ass hybrids with double power trains and even more failure points you could make, instead of switching over to clean electric-only vehicles.

So nothing to do with the specs you actually listed, but everything to do with some arbitrary guessed weight on your behalf, and drawbacks you just made up (body roll and quickly fading brakes).