kraftydevil
kraftyDevil
kraftydevil

I’ll be honest, I don’t always understand how everything fits together in this process ... to be fair scientists and researchers are constantly updating their understandings as new information comes to light... but as a guy who grew up in a very over the top conservative Christian home...(read - evolution is a tactic

Innovation us THE most important thing. No one wants a game to not improve and "innovate". This could be minor things. The issue is when there is zero innovation whatsoever. 

Because capitalism demands a larger sale with each iteration, or at least an equivalent sale.

So to argue ‘it’s okay for something to be bigger each time, while selling less each time’, strictly in capitalist terms, is a bad argument to make.

If we were speaking in a vacuum and not worrying about sales, and just looking

Fallout 4 didn’t fail because it deviated. Fallout 4 failed because it was so much more of the same from Fallout 3 and New Vegas. The storyline similarities between 3 and 4 are appalling, with more ‘looking for your super scientist relative who is secretly behind the whole thing’. The only real deviation was the

If trying to stop people from releasing information earlier than intended for release (or if ever) constitutes “shitty behaviour”, you should be very busy punishing every company on the planet. Different companies may be more or less successful at going after sources of leaked information, but no company doesn’t do

As someone who plays this consistently. These repair kits will make no difference to the “balance of power”. Yeah, you’ll save a little bit of time, maybe some caps, and some scrap. But scrap is so plentiful and crafting stations are pretty much everywhere, this is a fairly worthless item that mostly just save you

“Repair Kits are new utility items that will help you spend more time looting and shooting, and less time toiling away at a workbench fixing your gear,”

I think this is the right, measured take.

Do these "Repair Kits" somehow fix Fallout 76 itself?

It’s stuff like this that prevents me from entering a competitive environment in any game.

I have, for many years, maintained the truism that fighting with honor creates only a moral obligation to lose. If you cannot sort a route around your opponent’s tactics, that’s on you.  So long as the play was within established

OH MY GOD SORRY YOUR HUMOR WASN’T DISCERNIBLE VIA YOUR POST MY BAD SO EMBARRASSED OMG LOL OH ME, WHEN SHALL I LEARN?

How dare you condemn Italian fascism? Whatabout America’s use of nuclear bombs, oppression of blacks, and genocide of indigenous peoples?!?” said the very smart brain genius to a Canadian.

WRONG! We’re in the Dumber timeline. Or was that Jeff Daniels?

Completely agree with you on that. Wii had basically the same hardware as GameCube, so it can hardly be considered a port. Also, the game was perfect for the Wii controllers considering you had a red dot sight. It was so satisfying!  Hopefully we can give that a whirl with the joycons. 

I always thought the definitive version was the Wii version thanks to the fantastic Wiimote integration. That game felt so good to play in its day. Might still now but I haven’t tried. 

I actually bought the physical Switch cartridge from Amazon Japan (100% playable in English) even though I still have it for the PS2, Wii, PC, and PS Store. While I actually really loved the Wii version (I know it was hit or miss for people if the motion controls clicked with them) the Switch version is probably the

“Just out of curiosity, how much time have you put into the game?” 

Well if you don’t see the same people saying it to the guys then yeah, it’s a difference in the way the streams are viewed by the people commenting on them.

It isn’t necessarily being highlighted as objectifying here. It denotes that a man can get on the internet and stream some gaming shit and no one is discussing how cute he is, but when a woman does it they do. This isn’t a horrific thing in and of itself, but it does show that women are prized/judged for their looks