kraftydevil
kraftyDevil
kraftydevil

update - The answer to your question was actually in what you quoted - it just wasn’t obvious.

The EPA mandates less than 70 ppt. Then, other “scientists and environmental groups” say that 1 ppt is a better regulation. One such group: www.ewg.org

Maybe those numbers are different because the specific chemical or PFAs you referenced are different?

We should expect that acceptable ppt to depend on the actual chemical or PFA.

Am I correct to say that you’re not liking the assessment from Consumer Reports because you think 1 ppt of ANYTHING is probably fine?

Any button that makes you take your thumbs off the sticks are dumb. Need back paddles.

It needs more buttons so games can have more functionality. L4/R4 at least.

I’ll never understand nerfing in a single player or co-op games...”

I understand why they nerfed the Flakker, but it's clearly been over-nerfed. There was probably a happy medium in there.

I’m tired of living in a world of leaks that spoil the game. Maybe YouTubers shouldn’t leak content? Maybe the YouTube ad model is broken?

What about the idea that you have to purchase cosmetics in order to support the developer so they’ll make more playable content? I also prefer the paid DLC route, but there are so many people who think you have to buy cosmetics or there is no other way to get more playable content...

There’s so much information when people talk about “the devs”.

It’s chill. No NPCs though. Just robots. I’d say it’s almost ready to be released, but I still enjoy it.

Friends or not, who cares. I’ve followed strangers before in 76'. It's plausible.

So what’s your favorite version?

Not everyone finds items or quirky stages fun. Competitive play is a type of fun in itself.

It’s nowhere near “pretty good” in the current state. While my play sessions consist of me ignoring many basic bugs, I try very hard to keep going and make it work.

Why should we only think in terms of “is it negative coverage or is it positive?”

The games are also more complex in many ways.

The qualification “offensive” is really not the best standard for unacceptable speech. Using it as a reason just fuels the radical right.

It seems very likely that this was rushed for the holiday season. They should have given it another 6 months or even a year, but that timetable probably conflicted with their other releases.