You have odd hang-ups.
You have odd hang-ups.
Who said anything about having one only for breakfast? ;)
I get it, for the people who actually order one as a treat. I get skim milk in my coffee from Caribou. I think it’s more of an issue when someone uses that as an excuse for ordering a large sugar-filled drink with whip every day. I’m under no impression that my drink isn’t healthy, but it DOES lower the calories of…
No shit, lol. I love dessert coffees (can’t drink coffee straight up), but I A) don’t get them all the time, B) order a small, unless I’m getting a free size upgrade so it’s a medium), and C) usually order it with skim milk and no whip. It’s still not a HEALTHY drink, no, but I’m looking at closer to 250-300 calories…
Wow. Them supporting cops REALLY pissed you off, huh.
Shut up, Meg.
The barista who did it should have been fired. That’s inexcusable. Voice whatever you think of cops (or any other profession) on FB, but keep it away from your job. I personally wouldn’t have fired the manager, but I don’t think it’s unheard of to ultimately blame the person who, directly or indirectly, let it pass.
Who the hell takes an hour to decide who is paying??
I’m more than fine with them just setting the card on the table if they didn’t see me put it there. Waitstaff don’t usually hang around while people are digging for cards/change, anyway. And I wouldn’t want to assume based on the name, as couples often share accounts and names can be ambiguous.
Genetics don’t stop you from getting fat. She just burns off what she eats.
I think that’s a reach. Why not just place it on the edge of the table? No assumptions made. This is what I find most waitstaff do, anyway.
This. When it looks like a man and woman might be on a date, I don’t really mind if a bill is given to him (although I think it’s far more fair to just put it down on the table between them). It’s probably an unconscious assumption by the waiter. But if given a card by someone, special effort should be made to return…
Says the guy whose entire point was to tell someone they don’t get to find an irritation annoying.
“Oh, sister, who among us hasn’t been here?”
They’re only going after 4 specific people - not everyone who reshared photos.
I’d probably suspect, if they never showcased mp in a single trailer.
No one HAS to buy a game day one. You choose to do so, you take a risk. If you’re not 100% about a game, let other people take that risk (because there will ALWAYS be day 1 purchasers), and wait a bit.
Only the Sith deal in absolutes. We can do both.
The company apparently thinks otherwise, and has a lot more access to relevant information than we do.
“Imagine being some kid on 4chan, and you see some images of a game you’re excited bout, and you post them on Reddit, and three weeks later The Pokémon Company is trying to serve you a subpoena.”