I am intrigued by the wine-glass-to-wine-bottle ratio here. EVERYONE gets more than a full bottle to themselves, and that's just the wine. Sounds like a fun night!

It's such a scary chemical! I got a couple of granules on my face and got little infinitesimal burns, I was so worried about rubbing one into my eye. Eek!

Yes it has an odour when mixed, I was talking about dry lye. It is weird that they didn't notice the process once it was mixed though! Maybe if they only put in a few tablespoons? The concentration in soap making is way higher than you'd have it for iced tea sweetener.

I love how you're working so hard to make it dumb for people not to recognize a chemical you've never encountered. Seriously!

It doesn't smell like anything, actually, it's odourless. I make soap with lye, it could be mistaken for sweetener if you aren't thinking about it - granular, white, clumps together sometimes. It needs to be labelled, the employee isn't dumb for seeing white granules in a kitchen and thinking it is edible. And dry…

Everyone knows you need TWO labels to really mean it.

I hope so.............

OR A LABEL.

OH MY GOD. I have lye. It's labeled. I'm going to go label it again.

You're right about different body types, but that's usually handled by the design (I believe?) like a-line versus whatever, whereas different cuts are probably for different size ranges. The way the stores do it right now, which is usually by just making their clothes bigger and bigger until people fit inside them, is…

Well, that's why there are three patterns, not one. Clothing stores that have one cut and just up the size for plus size women aren't doing anyone favours. It looks like she has three (probably for three different size rangers), and she doesn't go forward with a design itself if she can't make it for three different…

You're always looking out for us!!! <3

Some of the arguments police have made in defense of police culture are that police need to be really closely bonded to be safe in their jobs - I've seen this as an excuse for not snitching, for being exclusionary, for not being transparent, for protecting officers against inquiry, that sort of thing, that there is a…

Do you think those are linked? Do people who would say "it's safer because it's more militaristic" have a leg to stand on?

Thank you for a good answer to a pretty hostile question!

She looks so natural as a flapper! And I really appreciate the Zenon reference, yessss.

That isn't hard to find. Texting habits generally get developed based on both people's habits. Note that most people are giving context.

What are the last two or three like? I'm not sure why their campaign donations from 13 election cycles ago (or even 5) is relevant. If they're changing, that's positive. If this message is contrary to their donations, that's worth knowing.

That sounds like a play on what 'vulnerable' means - like vulnerable to social censure versus vulnerable to the kinds of risks insurance protects you against (car accidents, house fires, etc.). Sounds sloppy, because of what you're saying here, it sounds like they're implying they protect LGBT people from the ways…

Hahaha, I'm really not upset. I think it's rather obtuse to think a straight up comparison between this and naked Disney princesses is useful (really? they really aren't comparable) but I think we are having trouble communicating accurately, so I'm gonna leave it at that. Have a good day!