Considering the timing—so many being found at once—I expect there’s a nice trace back to a single drop-off or pick-up, probably at a private postal outlet that will have copious cameras.
Considering the timing—so many being found at once—I expect there’s a nice trace back to a single drop-off or pick-up, probably at a private postal outlet that will have copious cameras.
Fuck the news.
Steam has critical mass such that high-demand games like this are unlikely to suffer long-term rating hits. If a game is good, honest positive reviews will balance out the negative whining ones. It’s also part of the reason they show both “Recent” and “All Time” scores which can further negate review bombs.
Juuuuust in case you don’t already have it set up: If you add games to your Wishlist on Steam gaben will send you an e-mail every day with what games are on sale (there’s probably an option to turn this on/off, too, but I think it’s on by default as I can’t recall setting it.) That way you won’t miss the next one!
Square thought about what would make them the most money. This was apparently their determination.
I love the practice of review bombing to express displeasure with something that is utterly unrelated to the quality of the game.
s/today/this decade/
Choose “L” if you’re driving an automatic and your hand moved too far
Ignoring that Bolton is a fuckstick and has no good reason for such a recommendation: would there even be a point in more/new nuclear missiles even if Russia was doing whatever they wanted (which, yeah, probably are)? Are our current nukes not enough to vaporize a few dozen countries in a retaliatory strike before…
Doesn’t have to be about selling, upgraded or new nukes can be used to further grease the military-industrial complex and “create jobs” domestically.
But if a boyfriend or husband ever told me that “our song” - the one he thought best represented all of his powerful emotions towards me and the special, nuanced love we shared - was from Frozen I’d probably call the cops.
I star, but his encouragement doesn’t budge the meter because it’s easy spin. Notrumps go “Trump’s personal lawyer says to vote against Trump!” while Trumps go “Cohen is a traitor and traitors support Democrats!”
Can we make it an absolute rule that any time someone is referenced who willingly joined the Trump campaign or administration, at any point, have “Former Trump-Staff-Member” or similar put in front of their name?
OP might be like me and blocks media by default; I can’t see the video without changing some settings (but I do know it’s there as I’m familiar with Kinja’s video layout.)
The article is saying we shouldn’t try to project emotions and situations onto humans who don’t have the maturity (biologically or mentally) to truly understand them and that doing so can lead to problems. If they actually express these things, that is one thing, but is not the same as adults assigning the expression…
Facebook actually has a curation system (“Most Relevant”), but it’s complete bullshit and only applies on a general level. There’s also no option to force it off by default, you have to deal with whatever Zuckerberg says you should see first. (As goes their timeline, too...)
I like to send hidden messages in my memes by using Comic Sans as the font.
That’s okay, your insults of me are pitiful compared to my own in any case.
I’m a master debater, though, so it’s okay.
I started doing this a few months back in a limited capacity: If I see someone just throwing around memes and images in news comment sections I immediately blocked them. They weren’t interested in explaining nor learning, they just wanted to shout whatever the poorly contrived image was about and then walk away.