Who polices the hyperbole police? Oh look....it’s this dumbass ^^^

AVClub: We’re going to pay you to post on our commment boards.

“Internet EXPLODES as antique game DESTROYS players with insult!”

Are you getting a commission for every time you post that?

And martians. You, of all people, don’t mention the martians?

“Incredibly” rude? Really? Like, this joke is so rude you simply cannot believe it? Remind me not to blow your mind by asking if you know how to keep an idiot in suspense...

I dunno, to me they all look like sportos, motorheads, geeks, sluts, bloods, waistoids, dweebies, and dickheads...not a righteous dude among them.

Hopefully they don’t Warp the original creators’ vision.

Being a Fox News correspondent is a little above and beyond being on a “team.” It’s the difference between being a 1940's German and actually being in the SS.

*brown

Awesome...another fantasy series that I’ll have to finish on TV because the author can’t be bothered to finish the fucking books!

Um, I don’t watch TV to remember TV, I watch TV to forget the rest of my life.

Short answer yes with an “if,” long answer no...with a “but.”

It’s not ironic at all if you understand that the current spelling is actually a corruption of the original “litorally.” As in, “You better believe it, beee-ach.”

<<really, very, awfully, super, terribly, wicked, hella, incredibly, mad, fucking>>

That’s exactly the problem, though. Because the only time when you would want to use it NOT hyperbolically is exactly when sentence context would make it seem like you WERE using it hyperbolically. You can’t use “literally” literally unless you say it twice. Like “I literally shit my pants....like, LITERALLY…