Maaaybe, but I just know I look at these and see those cheap shoes in my closet. I should note, I don’t think those shoes are necessarily bad. I think the inside of them is fairly comfortable too. But I can’t help but think that they took those exact same shoes, changed the color, and added an extra $100 for the color…

I respectfully disagree (That $115 isn’t that much), but it’s your money, spend it as you will.

The article literally says that you can buy shoes like this at walmart for $15, it’s not my fault no one actually read it.

And I mean, I have worn shoes that looked exactly like those, but black, and I got them for like $15. I think for $115 they can at least make the shoe out of something other than extremely flimsy cloth.

Well, they can match what’s on the poster, but for $115 I’d think they should be made out of material that isn’t extremely cheap flimsy cloth.

It’s because you can literally get the same shoes for $15, just without the color scheme. I think the main problem is the material they’re made out of. For $115, I’d think they should at least make it out of somewhat decent material, and I personally know the cloth those are made out of, and I can tell you it’s…

I believe the problem is you can get shoes that look EXACTLY like these for $15, just without the color scheme. It’s the material they’re made out of. They’re clearly made out of extremely cheap fabric that I know exactly of, cause I have shoes that look exactly like those in my closet. And it’s EXTREMELY cheap…

I snuck past this guy pretty easy. I noped right out of fighting him. No thanks.

We do, but from what I know it took historians awhile to figure it out.

People seem to completely miss the point of all this. This isn’t so you grand kids can play Super Mario Bros, and be super unimpressed by it. It’s so the histories of your great great great grand kids can research the games that existed a hundred years ago, and preserve possible research of our lives and entertainment…

To be fair to MS, they are pretty good at releasing their stuff on PC where there can always been a digital copy somewhere.

This isn’t about games with Hard copies though, they are specifically talking about games that don’t have hard copies in this context.

I still enjoy James Videoes, and I’m glad they’re in a more mentally stable place today, even if they seem on the point of losing their shit in every one of their videoes.

Ive said this a billion times, MS does not care about exclusivity. Certainly not now, when their goal is to sell Game Pass subs, but not even before, when they owned both the Xbox, and (And this is something everyone seems to forget.) The Windows OS that most PC gamers game on.

I mean, they specifically mentioned Playstation. But don't let actually reading the article stop you from being edgy.

Correct me if I’m wrong, it’s been ages since I’ve played this, but couldn’t you smack your buddies with your skateboard in this one? I distinctly remember doing that a lot. That was very jackass like, and pretty funny. Though would be more jackass like if you could dick punch each other from behind.

I think the idea is solid if they focused more on the multiplayer aspect. Maybe open world that you could go around, dick punching your friends in.

It makes perfect sense in the current story, since the factions aren’t technically fighting currently, and are suppose to be working together for a shared goal. And you can already work alongside members of the opposite faction if you have warmode off. I've helped several horde members when I saw them getting…

Well, PvP has to be toggled now anyway. So if you aren't in warmode, you don't even see unfriendly players. Though those in the opposite faction still appear as orange names.

No, but my point is something getting taken down on YouTube or Twitter doesn’t make it illegal. People are so disconnected with reality that they think that having a video on YouTube is some sort of legal right, so if a video is taken down it has to be a legal reason. Using YouTube isn't some sort of legal right. Its…