I don’t own the game yet, but I’d really love to get it just to explore DC, and see how close it is to the real thing. I lived in DC for a few years, and really liked the city. Like to see if I can find some familiar land marks. And I really want to compare the Air and Space Musuem to the real thing. It was my…

Friendlier or cheaper? Because it sounds like Sega is more concerned with the cheaper part.

For one, Crackdown 3 was a perfectly fine game, I don’t care what anyone says. It didn’t have any bugs, was a decent straight forward game, no loot boxes, and no special edition bullshit. I have no idea why people say that game was a failure, I very much enjoyed it.

Budget doesn’t necessarily mean blindly throwing…

Are they making an animation series, or more shorts? If this is just going to be shorts, that’s cool, the Mania shorts were fun. But if this is a full fledged SHOW, with say at least 15 minutes episodes, maybe around 8 episodes, that’s 2 hours of non-dialogue.

The cartoon isn’t going to have any dialogue?... Seriously? I know translation is expensive, but jeez, Sonic is Sega’s main mascot, they can’t put any freakin money into his representation? This is why Sonic games always fall short (Even some of the better ones are just ok, and could be a lot better), Sega is so damn…

Glad I’m not the only one.

I wish more fantasy games would allow me to play as my favorite fantasy race (Since I started playing DnD) Halflings. Sure, I suppose WoW has gnomes (Which I'm currently maining) but it's just not the same.

BEES!?

And I’m talking about full priced games. And even for FTP games, before loot boxes they made their money with subscription services, and by just directly selling the cosmetic items instead of putting them inside glorified gambling boxes and praying on people with gambling habits. There used to be this type of game…

Or I can reject them completely, and not buy games with loot boxes. I haven’t bought a game with loot boxes in years, and I don’t feel like I’m missing out.

Call of Duty is a full priced game, Modern Warfare was a addon for an overpriced deluxe edition, and was eventually sold separately. It was not free to play.

How about we just go back to not having glorified gambling in our full priced games, instead of discussing which digital casino has a better digital buffet?

I want to like this game, but no matter how many new stuff they add to it, I can’t get behind it until they add Local Multiplayer support. That was a big draw in L4D, how is it so many years later we’ve stepped so far forward, yet also jumped straight back.

If we’re lucky, the Democratic party will split. The Democratic party, as we can see from the next election that’s about to happen, is already split between all sorts of levels of liberalism. What the different parties call themselves is a different story.

So, I still don’t have a switch, but hope to eventually get one, so I’m unsure if the last one might have done this.
But, does anyone think this game will allow multiple game slots, and allow those game slots to interact via battling/trading? I ask, because if I ever did get this game, I’d definitely like to play with…

I really liked Zelda II myself, and I'm shocked other side scrollers don't take cues from it. I always wanted a similar game with better graphics. But despite all the 2D metrovania games out there, no other use a overhead overworked, and few use RPG mechanics.

Tried it. It's ok... But just makes me want to play Titanfall. It feels like a small part of what could have been a great game.

Im just so damn tired of BR games. I understand it's the big thing now, but I don't understand why these games can't have more than one game mode. Give me traditional deathmatch games, along with BR. How hard can it be to include a few extra game modes?

Tony Hawk seems to have the same curse as Sonic games. The concept should be simple. All it takes is making what was already done with better graphic and polish. But they can't seem to do it without making a buggy mess.

Im getting so sick of these.