It really doesn’t matter. She was a rape enabler in 78 and in 96 and in 99 and beyond. That’s all we know about.

Unless they get in the way of Hillary’s ambitions.

Here’s the actual thought experiment:

Rape apologist.

You’re a rape apologist. Go back to red pill.

You realize this line is basically used in every election, ever?

“all women should be believed” is only for the plebs. And it goes away as soon as people get hit by a moral dilemma.

That isn’t true. You cannot vote against a candidate. Only “for”.

And I’m capable of voting for someone who is a normal human when it comes to the complexity of family.

Actually, many states have laws that determine conduct via power relations. A boss having sex with an unpaid intern is one of those situations where the power aspect becomes very important.

This is going to sound snarky, but maybe she just loves him and thinks the good things he brings to her personal life outweigh his misdeeds?

had she actually divorced him and stood for something other than her own career.

It’s interesting to me that the perception is that HRC took on Universal Healthcare because she wanted the power that came with it, and not because she was genuinely interested in using her abilities to actually help people.

That’s the thing. HIS career suffered no serious setbacks because of the allegations, yet guilt by association is apparently enough to tank the career his wife (who has not, as far as I know, ever been accused of rape)??

the other is a medical doctor who panders to anti-vaccers and people worried about wifi

To me, this election has come down to one issue: keeping Trump out of office.

Juanita? She knew was was expected. Mexican women need to know that white men are their betters. Fucking hell. Clinton is racist, classist and horrid.

not entirely consensual

Wow this is an amazing justification.

Uh... multiple allegations by plenty of women?