kinosthesis
Joes
kinosthesis

Woah, his legal name sounds more like a rap name than his actual rap name.

No distractions at home? No phone ringing? Children? Significant other or roommate? Loud neighbors? Light coming in through the window? Car alarm or any other kind of street noise outside? You must live in a very secluded place. The fact is, there are all kinds of distractions at home that fade away in the theater,

I am a Billie Eilish agnostic, but her Barbie song is beautiful and I think it deserves the nod more than “I’m Just Ken.”

This is all just nonsense. All great movies have a sense of scale. Is Edward Yang’s Yi Yi not greatly benefited from seeing it on the largest screen possible, to absorb all the atmospherics and details packed into the frame? Jacques Tati’s PlayTime for its elaborate choreography in all those immaculate master shots?

Except Can You Ever Forgive Me?, which is a drama I guess but it’s also really funny.

I utterly abhor that line of thinking, that only “big action movies” are worth seeing in a theater. Absolute rubbish. The smallest, quietest indie movie or art film is immeasurably improved by seeing it in a theater. There’s just no comparison with home viewing; it’s a totally different phenomenological experience. Sit

“It’s been a tough few years for the good ol’ movie musical.”

“Shocking” might be just a tad hyperbolic. It was funny, which is weird to say about anything in the ceaselessly glum films of one Chris Nolan.

I was definitely distracted by Murphy’s eyes, especially because Nolan doesn’t seem to have heard of any shot scale that’s not a closeup. But it was neat that he closed them in the final shot.

I don’t think it’s fair, or reasonable, just the sad truth.

It’s over 20 years old, i.e., outside the purview of nu-AV Club writers.

Why is anyone surprised? The DNA test already told us she was 100% that bitch.

I am shocked that a relentlessly marketed movie based on perhaps the most popular toy brand in history is such a hit! Shocked!

Save your money.

I hate all of this, from all the Gen-Z lingo used in the article to the fact that you wrote a piece asking if Oppenheimer made Einstein a sex symbol and then spend the whole thing proving it didn’t.

Spider-Man 2 came out in 2004.

This is such bullshit. Like, 95% of the film is closeups of actors in rooms talking. There’s really not much going on visually; it’s hardly 2001 or Lawrence of Arabia levels of grandeur. Nolan still doesn’t seem to understand what makes an interesting shot composition, or he just doesn’t care.

“trust audiences to seek out good entertainment rather than mindlessly accepting what is fed to them.”

Have you tried logging in on your laptop? For some reason I was able to do so on a shared account even when I couldn’t on my television.