kinjawidgetninjadigits
KinjaWidgetNinjaDigits
kinjawidgetninjadigits

Yes, this. I just want to see him bust into the soul stone realm where everyone is. Walk out of the ship “Hey guys I’m about to jump on this ship and get out of this dudes weird dream world anybody want to come?”

Eh, I think this is just one part of a strategy to demonize social media platforms for “shadow banning conservative voices”.  

I mean I can be mad at George Zimmerman being found innocent, hundreds of cops not facing any murder charges, and still think that Jussie was guilty and deserved jail time. It’s not all mutually exclusive.

I guess he wasn’t technically singing, but - 

You don’t get it.

Weird how yesterday this was an example of yet another Schumer fail, but this post fails to mention how pretty much everyone, including AOC, Markey (who co-sponsored it) and progressive environmental groups was fine with this strategy, which worked, designed to counteract this trollish sham vote on a policy Democrats

Umm...I saw a video where she talked about drugging a man and allowing a “tranny” to perform sexual acts on him before she robbed him. Wouldn’t forced oral copulation be considered rape???

Yeah, I’m pretty sure “conflicts of interest = fire the journalist” isn’t the argument. The argument is “You had lots of talent available at your fingertips for this position, many of whom came up from nothing, and have no potential for conflicts of interest. Why do you keep filling those positions with relatives of

He wrote the headline with that question in mind, hence the inclusion of “powerful”

Bennet has not done a good job in putting the team together, I’m afraid. If he were a baseball coach he would have been fired after his third or fourth sub-.500 season. But at the New York Times, he can carry on his poor performance for an infinite amount of time, because he is the Platonic Ideal of what the

Daily reminder to thank the Baracka’s and Hot Take’s of the world for “voting their conscience” or not voting at all.

haven’t seen such prejudice against Bennets since Jane Austen smh

Sounds like they agreed to drop the charges in exchange for keeping his bond money. My hunch as a lawyer is that it probably would have cost the city a fortune in resources to prosecute this case and it was a strategic decision.

I am completely clueless as to what this means as far as the truth of the allegations.

Rather he argued that voters care about the costs associated with policies and that Democrats should be ready to answer questions about how they will pay for an idea while making big promises to constituents.

Yeah, this. Ideology-based lack of motivation? I can grok that. I can work with that.

Cesar Sayoc is feeling so vindicated now.

Good thing my opinion of Trump was never based on the Mueller Report.

I’m not buying that all these Russians interfered with our 2016 election and Flynn, Manafort (and, tangentially, Cohen) were the only Americans complicit in such interference.

It’s almost as if one of it’s primary goals is to support elected democratic congresspeople or something.

You can’t trademark the sound a choking bird makes