...Where’s Franklin?

I don’t know why she married him, but I know two people who got pulled into a ‘don’t marry him - problem solved’ situation. I can’t see this bride as being as guilty as him.

I’ve said this elsewhere, but I feel that he deserves all of that, as a murderer. I don’t see why everyone else does too.

...just because they did it, doesn’t mean you take up their tactics. You aren’t better than someone if you start copying them.

With them stunned into silence, in a place where they couldn’t leave and would be forced to hear it, when that wasn’t strictly necessary. And it was a wedding, no less.

“Invasive” is a new and worrying low, and the protest was too scattershot to be effective against backlash. It’s nothing to approve of.

...That’s a low bar for involvement. Shouldn’t the owner of the establishment also be complicit, then?

Your logic is flawed. We know about this event primarily because the protestor filmed it, not because someone from the party complained. In the earlier protest examples, it simply wasn’t possible to reach a large audience without assistance from media gatekeepers, making it a necessity to protest in a large way in…

A wedding isn’t an abhorrent action, though, and they’re almost never just for one person. Wrecking what should be even a somewhat happy moment does nothing but convince the attendants that they are now open to harassment/trauma through association.

...that’s big words coming from ‘Q-Anon’.

Collateral damage is a thing to be limited, not taken for granted. And... yeah, part of my objection to the article was that it takes away from Clark’s family.

I have been. Repeatedly. The words came from my fingers, not Third’s, and from my head, not Third’s. What he did had an effect on me, and I wasn’t thinking clearly enough to resist it. And it was a stupid thing to say, and I shouldn’t have said it.

What if he repents? Does what is necessary to earn Clark’s family’s forgiveness? Still more shunning?

No.

At the wedding, or in the backyard?

Good.

No, I wasn’t duped. (Third plays games. Don’t trust him.) I don’t know why I said what I did, why I used that example, and why I’m unable to edit it out of existence. I deserve all the shit I get for it.

...Except it’s not Clark’s name that’s ending up in the news now, with this. This stunt risks changing who the story is about. Clark is dead, and the living get to write his story - but did this help? I don’t see it that way.

What about his grandchildren and possible adopted children? Don’t forget about them too.

That’s still hundreds of maps to change.