Wait, wait - in this remake it’s a woman being relegated to the status of an undesirable second-class citizen because of her age? Nobody will buy that, Hollywood.

Quit being a knob.

Oh I’m sorry. He’s a racist anti-Semite who posts videos with Nazi imagery and “humor.” My mistake.

Fuck outta here.

We may as well spell out the subtext of your “genuine question” here: you want to say but know it sounds bad to say that you think people are being overly positive of this movie to a degree its merits don’t deserve because it features black people and you think politically correct liberals go out of their way to give…

Literally anyone could have written that false information. Your sources are suspect.

I guess I don’t get how you can play the “we’re doing real journalism” card when the NY Times busted the story wide-open with 5 sources in what, a few weeks since the Weinstein stuff broke? And you’ve supposedly had it for years?

Here’s the simple fact: The Washington Post did journalism the right way, and Jezebel did not.

The new AV Club: approximately 45% less content than before!!

This woman was at work. A women out in a social setting probably has different expectations for her interactions with men so flirting may not be unwelcome.

When they told him to make his own herbal concoction he just stood in one place in a huge denim jacket with his arms behind his back in protest.

Oh great. Because why would I want to be able to follow TV reviews without scrolling for a minute and a half? Separate sections for delineated content is sooooooooo 2014.

No, Kinja changed it’s format after other verticals were getting rape and animal mutiliation gifs and videos.

Oh, yeah, I remember reading something about that. Let’s see if I can find it right here. . .

If you’re going to tell a story and use that story to explain why people should avoid a business, it should make some sort of sense.

You realize once the court rules in something, that doesn’t make it a forever thing, right?