I strongly urge anyone who has an objection to this game existing to report it on Steam using the flag icon to the right of the “About This Game” section (just above the metacritic score, and just below the developer and publisher details).
I strongly urge anyone who has an objection to this game existing to report it on Steam using the flag icon to the right of the “About This Game” section (just above the metacritic score, and just below the developer and publisher details).
“Yeah, it’s not great that the scientists built a ray gun that will kill us all tomorrow. But who are we to step in the way of progress? This technology is here now and we should all just choose the best way to die.”
Can liberal based humor be bad? Of course because everything can be bad. But right wing comedy is a special kind of bad specifically because it’s not really about being funny. What’s “funny” is not the content of a racist, but rather that it’s going to upset liberals “because” you made that racist joke. And that’s…
The photocopier maybe has a few preloaded images in it, like a test page for example. The data of this image is contained within the product being sold (the copier). That image fine to distribute with it because it is either not copywritable, or the company has the rights to the image. What a photocopier probably…
Yeah, your understanding of AI seems to be that its capable of any sort of thought and it isn't, its weird how you guys live in a fantasy world where a set of algorithms is capable of anything other than vomiting data.
I’m assuming that’s a typo and you mean the gay frog thing. And yes some people really believe it.
Cool. Point me to the training set and the weights for the Mona Lisa.
If you duplicated Midjourney’s proprietary source code, renamed all the variable names, and sold “your” new software, they would sue you into oblivion for copyright theft despite it not looking identical to the original.
To paraphrase Richard Spencer: “We expect our opponents to preserve freedom of speech, but we have no obligation to support it once we take power.”
For 2, its the person, not the crime. They do not give a single solitary fuck about the crime, it’s the person that’s bad and must be stopped.
How in the hell do Jones’ sympathizers support Trump considering they rail against Clinton for being a rapist (Trump has TWENTY-SIX sexual assault claims against him and recently lost a civil case and appeals effort against Jean Carroll for defamation regarding rape).
to develop new products and software is totally fine so long as the copyrighted work is no longer present in the released product
“At least be intellectually consistent.”
1. Does Alex Jones make any money off of this? If so, pretty much every cent (besides the absolute minimum expenses needed to survive at poverty level) should go to the victims he owes from his defamation case (which he cowardly declared bankruptcy to try and avoid).
AI models cannot ‘learn’ in the same way a human can learn. It cannot have it’s own experience or perspective, it cannot create what a human artist can because it is simply not thinking. A child can draw a house without ever seeing another drawing of a house- an AI model purely fed with photos of houses could only…
It is the same way every artist starts.
It’s not all corporate welfare. They did actually electrify rural homes, y’know.
You sound like an insufferable twat.
Strange is a troll, check their comment history. Just dismiss their bullshit.